The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer‐ and Dendrimer‐Bound Ti‐TADDOLates in Catalytic (and Stoichiometric) Enantioselective Reactions: Are pentacoordinate cationic Ti complexes the catalytically active species?
Abstract
α,α,α′,α′‐T etra a ryl‐1,3‐d ioxolane‐4,5‐d imethan ol s (TADDOLs), containing styryl groups either at C(2) of the heterocyclic ring or in the α‐position, were prepared in the usual way (18–22, 24, 25). These compounds were copolymerized with styrene and divinylbenzene in a suspension, yielding polymers (33–40, Scheme 3) as beads with a rather uniform particle‐size distribution (150–45 μm), swellable in common organic solvents. HOCH 2‐ and BrCH 2‐substituted TADDOLs were also prepared and used for attachement to Merrifield resin or to dendritic molecules (23, 26–32). The TADDOL moieties in these materials are accessible to form Ti (and Al) complexes (Scheme 4) which can be used as polymer‐ or dendrimer‐bound reagents (stoichiometric) or Lewis acids (catalytic). The reactions studied with these new chiral auxiliaries are: enantioselective nucleophilic additions to aldehydes (of R 2 Zn and RTi(OCHMe 2)3; Scheme 5, Table 1) and to ketones (of LiAlH 4, Table 2); enantioselective ring opening of meso‐anhydrides (Scheme 6); [4+2] and [3+2] cycloadditions of 3‐crotonyl‐1,3‐oxazolidin‐2‐one to cyclopentadiene and to (Z)‐N‐benzylidenephenylamine N‐oxide ( → 48, 49, Scheme 7, Tables 3, 4, and Fig. 5). The enantioselectivities reached with most of the polymer‐bound or dendritic TADDOL ligands were comparable or identical to those observed with the soluble analogs. The activity of the polymer‐bound Lewis acids was only slightly reduced as compared with that encountered under homogeneous conditions. Multiple use of the beads (up to 10 times), without decreased performance, has been demonstrated (Figs. 3 and 4). The poorer selectivity in the Diels‐Alder reaction (Scheme 7a), induced by the polymer‐bound Cl 2 Ti‐TADDOLate as compared to the soluble one, is taken as an opportunity to discuss the mechanism of this Lewis‐acid catalysis, and to propose a cationic, trigonal‐bipyramidal complex as the catalytically active species (Fig. 6). It is suggested that similar cations may be involved in other Ti‐TADDOLate‐mediated reactions as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noyori, R., & Kitamura, M. (1991) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.199100491 · Cited by 1,214
Asymmetric autocatalysis and amplification of enantiomeric excess of a chiral molecule
Soai, K., Shibata, T., Morioka, H., & Choji, K. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378767a0 · Cited by 1,085
Cited by
Asymmetric 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactions
Gothelf, K. V., & Jørgensen, K. A. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr970324e · Cited by 1,912
Metadata
- Authors
- Seebach, D., Marti, R. E., & Hintermann, T.
- Venue
- Helvetica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09-18
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1710-1740
- ISSN
- 0018-019X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2675
- OpenAlex
- W2045913156
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer‐ and Dendrimer‐Bound Ti‐TADDOLates in Catalytic (and Stoichiometric) Enantioselective Reactions: Are pentacoordinate cationic Ti complexes the catalytically active species? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hlca.19960790621
- The paper
- Seebach, D., Marti, R. E., & Hintermann, T. (1996). Polymer‐ and Dendrimer‐Bound Ti‐TADDOLates in Catalytic (and Stoichiometric) Enantioselective Reactions: Are pentacoordinate cationic Ti complexes the catalytically active species? Helvetica Chimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19960790621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.