The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition
Abstract
Two paradigm shifts are discussed here: talentship and sustainability. First, the traditional service‐oriented HR focus must be extended to a “decision science” that enhances decisions about human capital. We call this decision science talentship. It includes talent segmentation, or identifying pivotal talent pools where the quality and/or availability of human capital makes the biggest difference to strategic success. Second, HR and business leaders increasingly define organizational effectiveness beyond traditional financial outcomes to encompass sustainability—achieving success today without compromising the needs of the future. A common strategic human capital decision science can reveal pivotal talent under both traditional and sustainability‐based definitions, and thus uncover important insights about the talent implications of the shifting definition of strategic success. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,837
“, 2001) an emerging literature base advocates a focus on the identification of key positions (Boudreau and Ramstad, 2005; 2007) or “A positions” (Huselid et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialDumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21792 · Cited by 1,535
Emergence of the Human Capital Resource: A Multilevel Model
Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0318 · Cited by 1,162
The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612436661 · Cited by 1,104
Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-20
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-136
- ISSN
- 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-050X
- OpenAlex
- W2014425518
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hrm.20054
- The paper
- Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2005). Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
