The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptions or reality: Is multi‐perspective measurement a means or an end?
Abstract
This article takes an epistemological perspective on “perceptions or reality” when examining multi‐rater assessment measures as means versus ends and contrasts the scientist's and practitioner's perspectives. Multiple ratings—when used to map differences as well as similarities in perceptions about common reference points—can be powerful tools for individual or organizational development applications. The application of measurement tools for development purposes is quite different from the psychometric focus of measurement, however. In the latter, measurement becomes an end in itself; in the former, it is more a means to an end. © 1993 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whither Industrial and Organizational Psychology in a Changing World of Work?
Cascio, W. F. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.11.928 · Cited by 455
Fiedeldey-Van Dijk, C., Rowan, M., Dell, C., Mushquash, C., Hopkins, C., Fornssler, B., Hall, L., Mykota, D., Farag, M., & Shea, B. (2017) · Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/15332640.2015.1119774 · Cited by 88
Varela, O. E., & Premeaux, S. F. (2008) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00418.x · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Tornow, W. W.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-050X
- OpenAlex
- W2165486328
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
