The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TP53 and gastric carcinoma: A review
Abstract
In this article, we survey the major p53 (TP53) alterations identified in gastric carcinomas and their precursors. These include p53 expression, mutations, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Not only are the various abnormalities summarized, but in addition there is a survey of the literature with respect to the impact of these changes on patient prognosis and treatment response. The majority of published studies involve the immunohistochemical detection of the protein. These use different antibodies, different detection techniques, and different methods of interpretation. Therefore not surprisingly, the results of many of the studies are contradictory with one another. Overall, however, it appears that p53 alterations occur early in the development of gastric carcinoma, being present even in the nonneoplastic mucosa and they increase in frequency as one progresses along the pathway of gastric carcinoma development. p53 immunoreactivity is seen in 17%-90.7% of invasive gastric carcinomas. p53 alterations occur much more commonly in proximal lesions than in distal ones, suggesting that the molecular events leading to the development of gastric carcinoma may be very different in proximal vs. distal tumors. p53 mutations occur in 0%-77% of gastric carcinomas. The mutations are distributed widely across the gene from exons 4-11 with hot spots of mutation at codons 175, 248, 273, 282, 245, and 213. G:C>A:T transitions at CpG sites are the commonest type of mutation. At least 60% of carcinomas with mutations also exhibit p53 LOH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Regulation of p53 function and stability by phosphorylation.
Ashcroft, M., Kubbutat, M. H. G., & Vousden, K. H. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.3.1751 · Cited by 452
Cited by
Ajani, J. A., Lee, J., Sano, T., Janjigian, Y. Y., Fan, D., & Song, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.36 · Cited by 594
Therapeutic targeting of p53: all mutants are equal, but some mutants are more equal than others
Sabapathy, K., & Lane, D. P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.151 · Cited by 517
Libè, R., Groussin, L., Tissier, F., Elie, C., René-Corail, F., Fratticci, A., Jullian, E., Beck-Peccoz, P., Bertagna, X., Gicquel, C., et al. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2085 · Cited by 115
Ceder, S., Eriksson, S. E., Liang, Y. Y., Cheteh, E. H., Zhang, S. M., Fujihara, K. M., Bianchi, J., Bykov, V. J. N., Abrahmsen, L., Clemons, N. J., et al. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-03988-y · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenoglio-Preiser, C. M., Wang, J., Stemmermann, G. N., & Noffsinger, A.
- Venue
- Human Mutation
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2003-02-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-270
- ISSN
- 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1004
- OpenAlex
- W1966660119
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TP53 and gastric carcinoma: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.10180
- The paper
- Fenoglio-Preiser, C. M., Wang, J., Stemmermann, G. N., & Noffsinger, A. (2003). TP53 and gastric carcinoma: A review. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.10180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.