Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker

Wildeman, Martin, van Ophuizen, Ernest, den Dunnen, Johan T., Taschner, Peter E.M.·2008·Human Mutation

Abstract

Unambiguous and correct sequence variant descriptions are of utmost importance, not in the least since mistakes and uncertainties may lead to undesired errors in clinical diagnosis. We developed the Mutation Analyzer (Mutalyzer) sequence variation nomenclature checker (www.lovd.nl/mutalyzer; last accessed 13 September 2007) for automated analysis and correction of sequence variant descriptions using reference sequences from any organism. Mutalyzer handles most variation types: substitution, deletion, duplication, insertion, indel, and splice-site changes following current recommendations of the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS). Input is a GenBank accession number or an uploaded reference sequence file in GenBank format with user-modified annotation, an HGNC gene symbol, and the variant (single or in a batch file). Mutalyzer generates variant descriptions at DNA level, the level of all annotated transcripts and the deduced outcome at protein level. To validate Mutalyzer's performance and to investigate the sequence variant description quality in locus-specific mutation databases (LSDBs), more than 11,000 variants in the PAH, BIC BRCA2, and HbVar databases were analyzed, showing that 87%, 25%, and 38%, respectively, were error-free and following the recommendations. Low recognition rates in BIC and HbVar (38% and 51%, respectively) were due to lack of a well-annotated genomic reference sequence (HbVar) or noncompliance to the guidelines (BRCA2). Provided with well-annotated genomic reference sequences, Mutalyzer is very effective for the curation of newly discovered sequence variation descriptions and existing LSDB data. Mutalyzer will be linked to the Leiden Open source Variation Database (LOVD) (www.LOVD.nl; last accessed 13 September 2007) and is the first module of a sequence variant effect prediction package.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.20654

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Wildeman, M., van Ophuizen, E., den Dunnen, J. T., & Taschner, P. E. M.
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2007
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
6-13
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W2099101325
Cited by
392
References
1
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.20654
The paper
Wildeman, M., van Ophuizen, E., den Dunnen, J. T., & Taschner, P. E. M. (2008). Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20654

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.