Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted Next‐Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability

Open access
Grozeva, Detelina, Carss, Keren, Spasic‐Boskovic, Olivera, Tejada, Maria‐Isabel, Gecz, Jozef, Shaw, Marie, Corbett, Mark, Haan, Eric, Thompson, Elizabeth, Friend, Kathryn, Hussain, Zaamin, Hackett, Anna, Field, Michael, Renieri, Alessandra, Stevenson, Roger, Schwartz, Charles, Floyd, James A.B., Bentham, Jamie, Cosgrove, Catherine, Keavney, Bernard, Bhattacharya, Shoumo, Italian X‐linked Mental Retardation Project, UK10K Consortium, GOLD Consortium, Hurles, Matthew, Raymond, F. Lucy·2015·Human Mutation

Abstract

To identify genetic causes of intellectual disability (ID), we screened a cohort of 986 individuals with moderate to severe ID for variants in 565 known or candidate ID-associated genes using targeted next-generation sequencing. Likely pathogenic rare variants were found in ∼11% of the cases (113 variants in 107/986 individuals: ∼8% of the individuals had a likely pathogenic loss-of-function [LoF] variant, whereas ∼3% had a known pathogenic missense variant). Variants in SETD5, ATRX, CUL4B, MECP2, and ARID1B were the most common causes of ID. This study assessed the value of sequencing a cohort of probands to provide a molecular diagnosis of ID, without the availability of DNA from both parents for de novo sequence analysis. This modeling is clinically relevant as 28% of all UK families with dependent children are single parent households. In conclusion, to diagnose patients with ID in the absence of parental DNA, we recommend investigation of all LoF variants in known genes that cause ID and assessment of a limited list of proven pathogenic missense variants in these genes. This will provide 11% additional diagnostic yield beyond the 10%-15% yield from array CGH alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.22901

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Grozeva, D., Carss, K., Spasic‐Boskovic, O., Tejada, M., Gecz, J., Shaw, M., Corbett, M., Haan, E., Thompson, E., Friend, K., Hussain, Z., Hackett, A., Field, M., Renieri, A., Stevenson, R., Schwartz, C., Floyd, J. A. B., Bentham, J., Cosgrove, C., Keavney, B., Bhattacharya, S., Italian X‐linked Mental Retardation Project, UK10K Consortium, GOLD Consortium, Hurles, M., & Raymond, F. L.
Venue
Human Mutation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-30
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1197-1204
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W1810362853
Cited by
187
References
18
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted Next‐Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.22901
The paper
Grozeva, D., Carss, K., Spasic‐Boskovic, O., Tejada, M., Gecz, J., Shaw, M., Corbett, M., Haan, E., Thompson, E., Friend, K., Hussain, Z., Hackett, A., Field, M., Renieri, A., Stevenson, R., Schwartz, C., Floyd, J. A. B., Bentham, J., Cosgrove, C., . . . Raymond, F. L. (2015). Targeted Next‐Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.