Familial melanoma, pancreatic cancer and germline CDKN2A mutations
Open accessAbstract
Germline CDKN2A mutations have been observed in approximately 20 percent of familial melanoma kindreds from North America, Europe and Australasia. There is also an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in a subset of families with mutations, however, the precise relationship between the CDKN2A gene and pancreatic cancer remains unknown. The relationships between familial melanoma, pancreatic cancer and germline CDKN2A mutations were examined using published data. There were 67 different CDKN2A mutations in 189 melanoma-prone families. Forty-two families (18 mutations) had pancreatic cancer reported. For families without reported pancreatic cancer, the most common types of mutations were missense (56%), frameshift (12%), and deletions (12%). For families with pancreatic cancer, missense (56%), splicing (17%), and frameshift (11%) mutations were most common. Seventy percent of the mutations were observed only once, while the remainder recurred in different families. Comparison of 147 melanoma-prone families without pancreatic cancer to the 42 families that had pancreatic cancer reported showed no significant differences in the types or locations of mutations. However, there was a significant difference (p=0.002) in the distribution of families across the four ankyrin repeats. This finding primarily resulted from the six most frequent mutations where the distribution of pancreatic cancer varied significantly (p=0.02) from at least 30% in c.301G>T (p.G101W), c.225_243del19 (p.P75fs), c.337_338insGTC (p.R112_L113insR), and c.377T>A (p.V126D) families to less than 10% in c.71G>C (p.R24P) and c.159G>C (p.M53I) families. Further research utilizing individual-specific data will be required to determine whether these patterns represent etiologic differences or incomplete reporting of cancer and mutation data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Germline CDKN2A mutations in familial melanoma-prone families showed diverse mutation types and variable pancreatic cancer distribution, suggesting genetic heterogeneity.
“Germline CDKN2A mutations in familial melanoma-prone families showed diverse mutation types and variable pancreatic cancer distribution, suggesting genetic heterogeneity [48].”
From Significance of TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Goldstein, A. M.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldstein, Alisa M.
- ORCID
- Goldstein, Alisa M.
- Venue
- Human Mutation
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 630-630
- ISSN
- 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1004
- OpenAlex
- W2130634070
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 4261 d)
- Locations
- Human Mutation (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Keywords
- CDKN2A, germline mutations, familial melanoma, pancreatic cancer, melanoma-prone families, ankyrin repeats, mutation types, frameshift mutation, missense mutations, cancer risk
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Melanoma, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Skin Neoplasms, Germ-Line Mutation, Genes, p16
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review