Cited by 134Coffee research and impactsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Habitual caffeine consumption and its relation to memory, attention, planning capacity and psychomotor performance across multiple age groups

Open access
Hameleers, P. A. H. M, Van Boxtel, M. P. J, Hogervorst, E, Riedel, W. J, Houx, P. J, Buntinx, F, Jolles, J·2000·Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

The present study evaluated the association between habitual caffeine intake via coffee and tea and cognitive performance. This was done as part of a larger research programme into the determinants of cognitive ageing (the Maastricht Aging Study: MAAS). Possible withdrawal effects that may have explained in part the positive association between performance and intake in an earlier study were controlled for. In addition, all cognitive tests in this study were administered under strict laboratory conditions. A group of 1875 healthy adults, stratified for age (range 24 - 81 years), sex, and general ability, were screened for habitual intake of coffee and tea and took part in extensive cognitive testing. Multiple regression analysis with control for age, sex, socio-demographic variables, and substance use showed that habitual caffeine consumption was significantly related to better long-term memory performance and faster locomotor speed. No relationships were found between habitual caffeine consumption and short-term memory, information processing, planning, and attention as measured with the Stroop Test. Moreover, no difference in sensitivity to caffeine intake between different age groups was found, suggesting that caffeine intake did not counteract age-related cognitive decline. Several recommendations are made to improve the design of future studies in this field. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.218

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large longitudinal clinical studies in different countries have established an inverse relationship between coffee consumption and memory decline during normal aging.

    “Based on these animal studies, several large longitudinal clinical studies in different countries have established an inverse relationship between coffee consumption and memory decline during normal aging (86–88).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [86]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 134

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. De Bie SE[ 0876[ Standaardvra`en 0876] Voorstellen voor Uniformerin`van Vraa`stellin`en naar Ach! ter`rondkenmerken en Interviews ðStandard Questions 0876] Proposal for Uniformisation of Questions Re`ard! in`Back`round Variables and InterviewsŁ[ Leiden Uni! versity Press] Leiden\ The Netherlands[

Authors
Hameleers, P. A. H. M., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., Hogervorst, E., Riedel, W. J., Houx, P. J., Buntinx, F., & Jolles, J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
573-581
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W2055144875
Cited by
134
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
caffeine consumption, coffee, tea, cognitive aging, memory, attention, planning, psychomotor performance, locomotion speed, age-related cognitive decline, Stroop task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review