Cited by 42Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Two weeks of pretreatment with escitalopram facilitates extinction learning in healthy individuals

Bui, Eric, Orr, Scott P., Jacoby, Ryan J., Keshaviah, Aparna, LeBlanc, Nicole J., Milad, Mohammed R., Pollack, Mark H., Simon, Naomi M.·2013·Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether pretreatment with escitalopram would be associated with reduced fear acquisition and enhanced extinction learning in a fear conditioning paradigm, compared with placebo. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized in double-blind fashion, to 14 days of escitalopram 10 mg/day (n = 18) or placebo (n = 20) prior to a classical fear conditioning paradigm. RESULTS: Although escitalopram was associated with a smaller skin conductance (SC) orienting response during habituation, no medication effects on fear acquisition were found. Escitalopram was associated with faster extinction of SC responses, compared with placebo, as revealed by a significant drug × conditioned stimulus × trial interaction for early extinction (F(3, 30) = 3.26, p = 0.035) and late extinction (F(3, 30) = 3.27, p = 0.035) trials. After adjustment for age, orienting response, and acquisition, results from linear contrast remained significant for early extinction (F(1, 29) = 5.43, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram administered for 14 days prior to a fear conditioning paradigm did not influence acquisition of a conditioned fear response but did facilitate extinction learning. Impairments in extinction learning have been identified as a key component of posttraumatic stress disorder; our preliminary findings suggest that additional experimental and clinical studies assessing the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for posttraumatic stress disorder prevention are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.2330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 42

Authors
Bui, E., Orr, S. P., Jacoby, R. J., Keshaviah, A., LeBlanc, N. J., Milad, M. R., Pollack, M. H., & Simon, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Anxiety and Traumatic Stress Disorders Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-15
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
447-456
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W2132706865
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
escitalopram, extinction learning, fear conditioning, fear acquisition, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, skin conductance, orienting response, post-traumatic stress disorder, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Citalopram, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review