Cited by 64Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Relationship of plasma amphetamine levels to physiological, subjective, cognitive and biochemical measures in healthy volunteers

Asghar, Sheila J., Tanay, Veronique A. M. I., Baker, Glen B., Greenshaw, Andy, Silverstone, Peter H.·2003·Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

Acute administration of the stimulant dextro-amphetamine produces multiple physiological, subjective cognitive and biochemical changes. These effects are similar to those seen in mania, and may be a useful model for mania. The aim of the present study was more fully to determine the multiple effects of dextro-amphetamine and to relate these to changes in plasma levels of the drug. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 25 healthy volunteers (ages 18-45), the effects of 25 mg of oral dextro-amphetamine were examined. Physiological, subjective, cognitive changes, concentrations of amino acids and metabolites of biogenic amines period were related to changes in plasma amphetamine concentrations over 500 min. Peak concentrations of dextro-amphetamine occurred at 2.5-3.5 h post-administration and levels decreased to 75% of peak value after 500 min. The results from the present study indicate that the subjective psychological, cognitive and blood pressure changes frequently did not mirror the time course of plasma levels of the drug. Thus, there was no clear-cut relationship between plasma levels and effects. In addition, dextro-amphetamine caused no significant changes in amino acids or amino metabolite concentrations. In conclusion, while dextro-amphetamine administration definitely causes several changes which are seen in mania, there remain some physiological and metabolic differences between these two conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 64

Authors
Asghar, S. J., Tanay, V. A. M. I., Baker, G. B., Greenshaw, A., & Silverstone, P. H.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Silverstone, Peter H.
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-13
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
291-299
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W1982900708
Cited by
64
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
plasma drug concentration, pharmacokinetics, stimulant effects, subjective effects, cognitive effects, blood pressure, amino acids, biogenic amine metabolites, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Anxiety, Bipolar Disorder, Blood Pressure, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Happiness, Humans, Hunger, Irritable Mood, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Psychomotor Agitation, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review