The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling impacts of agricultural practice on flood peaks in upland catchments: An application of the distributed TOPMODEL
Abstract
Upland agricultural land management activities such as grazing, vegetation burning, and bare ground restoration impact hydrological elements of headwater catchments, many of which may be important for downstream flood peaks (e.g., overland flow and soil water storage). However, there is poor understanding of how these management practices affect river flow peaks during high magnitude rainfall events. Using the distributed TOPMODEL, spatial configurations of land management were modelled to predict flood response in an upland catchment, which contains different regions operating subsidized agricultural stewardship schemes. Heavy grazing leading to soil compaction and loss of vegetation cover in stewardship regions covering 79.8% of the catchment gave a 42‐min earlier flow peak, which was 82.2% higher (under a 1‐hr 15‐mm storm) than the current simulated hydrograph. Light grazing over the same regions of the catchment had much less influence on river flow peaks (18 min earlier and 32.9% increase). Rotational burning (covering 8.8% of the catchment), most of which is located in the headwater areas, increased the peak by 3.2% in the same rainfall event. Vegetation restoration with either Eriophorum or Sphagnum (higher density) in bare areas (5.8%) of the catchment provided a reduction of flood peak (3.9% and 5.2% in the 15‐mm storm event), whereas the same total area revegetated with Sphagnum in riparian regions delivered a much larger decrease (15.0%) in river flow peaks. We sho…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wildfires alter stream flow response to precipitation.
“Wildfires alter stream flow response to precipitation (Gao et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Bladon, et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Caldwell, et al., 2017; Shakesby & Doerr, 2006), and mobilize a variety of pollutants through downwind deposition or subsequent runoff.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Gao et al., 2017
Wildfires mobilize a variety of pollutants through downwind deposition or subsequent runoff.
“Wildfires alter stream flow response to precipitation (Gao et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Bladon, et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Caldwell, et al., 2017; Shakesby & Doerr, 2006), and mobilize a variety of pollutants through downwind deposition or subsequent runoff.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Gao et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.5194/hess-16-2299-2012 · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02626667909491834 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/1752-1688.12294 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00085-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.10408 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015WR017667 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60088-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.2005.1671 · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.1014 · DOI
- 10.1029/2002WR001956 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1029/2007WR006052 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.9875 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014WR016782 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1087::AID-HYP546>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- Lane S. N., 2003, Global warming in a Yorkshire context
- 10.1002/hyp.9285 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04317.x · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.7157 · DOI
- 10.1002/esp.1352 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.033 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00240.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00291.x · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.3360050106 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017WR020723 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(270) · DOI
- Shaw S. C. Wheeler B. D. Kirby P. Phillipson P. &Edmunds R. (1996).Literature review of the historical effects of burning and grazing of blanket bog and upland wet heath. English Nature.
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01222.x · DOI
- Zhao Y. (2007).Livestock impacts on hydrological connectivity. PhD Thesis School of Geography The University of Leeds.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 241
“Wildfires alter stream flow response to precipitation (Gao et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Bladon, et al., 2017; Hallema, Sun, Caldwell, et al., 2017; Shakesby & Doerr, 2006), and mobilize a variety of pollutants through downwind deposition or subsequent runoff.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, J., Holden, J., & Kirkby, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Jihui
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4206-4216
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2755968063
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hydrological Processes (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- flood peaks, upland catchments, agricultural land management, grazing, revegetation, peat moss, cottongrass, soil compaction, headwater catchments, surface runoff, soil water storage, riparian zones, distributed hydrological model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review