The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data
Abstract
Previously we have detailed an application of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) procedure to estimate spatially distributed uncertainty in models conditioned against binary pattern data contained in flood inundation maps. This method was applied to two sites where a single consistent synoptic image of inundation extent was available to test the simulation performance of the method. In this paper, we extend this to examine the predictive performance of the method for a reach of the River Severn, west‐central England. Uniquely for this reach, consistent inundation images of two major floods have been acquired from spaceborne synthetic aperture radars, as well as a high‐resolution digital elevation model derived using laser altimetry. These data thus allow rigorous split sample testing of the previous GLUE application. To achieve this, Monte Carlo analyses of parameter uncertainty within the GLUE framework are conducted for a typical hydraulic model applied to each flood event. The best 10% of parameter sets identified in each analysis are then used to map uncertainty in flood extent predictions using the method previously proposed for both an independent validation data set and a design flood. Finally, methods for combining the likelihood information derived from each Monte Carlo ensemble are examined to determine whether this has the potential to reduce uncertainty in spatially distributed measures of flood risk for a design flood. The results show that for this reach and these events, the method previously established is able to produce sharply defined flood risk maps that compare well with observed inundation extent. More generally, we show that even single, poor‐quality inundation extent images are useful in constraining hydraulic model calibrations and that values of effective friction parameters are broadly stationary between the two events simulated, most probably reflecting their similar hydraulics. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
Self-citation
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Wilson, M. D. (2007) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021 · Cited by 440
Self-citationMulti-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models
Pappenberger, F., Beven, K. J., Ratto, M., & Matgen, P. (2008) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009 · Cited by 276
Self-citationAn Operational Method for Flood Directive Implementation in Ungauged Urban Areas
Papaioannou, G., Efstratiadis, A., Vasiliades, L., Loukas, A., Papalexiou, S. M., Koukouvinos, A., Tsoukalas, I., & Kossieris, P. (2018) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology5020024 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., Aronica, G., & Beven, K.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3347-3370
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2078483723
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.1499
- The paper
- Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., Aronica, G., & Beven, K. (2004). Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.