The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop‐FS
Abstract
This paper describes a coupled, distributed, hydrological‐geotechnical model, GEOtop‐FS, which simulates the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and debris flows. We use a hydrological distributed model, GEOtop, which, models latent and sensible heat fluxes and surface runoff, and computes soil moisture in 3‐D by solving Richards'equation numerically, together with an infinite‐slope geotechnical model, GEOtop‐FS. The combined model allows both the hydraulic and geotechnical properties of soil to be considered and realistically modelled. In particular, the model has been conceived to make direct use of field surveys, geotechnical characteristics and soil moisture measurements. In the model the depth of available sediments is also used to characterize the hydraulic properties of the area examined. To account for the uncertainty related to the natural variability in the factors influencing the stability of natural slopes, the safety factor is computed with a probabilistic approach. In order to determine the likelihood of slope failures, soil parameters are assigned distributions instead of single deterministic values. The analysis presented was carried out for an alpine watershed, located in the Friuli region, Italy, for which some geological and geotechnical data were available. In the past, this watershed experienced landslides and debris flows during intense storms following long and moderate intensity rainfall events. The distributed coupled GEOtop‐FS model was calibrated by reproducing some of these events and validated in order to map future failure probabilities. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Cited by
A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 · Cited by 2,347
Landslides in a changing climate
Gariano, S. L., & Guzzetti, F. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011 · Cited by 1,737
Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk
Corominas, J., van Westen, C., Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J.-P., Fotopoulou, S., Catani, F., Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Mavrouli, O., Agliardi, F., et al. (2013) · Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8 · Cited by 1,242
Quantifying lateral root reinforcement in steep slopes – from a bundle of roots to tree stands
Schwarz, M., Lehmann, P., & Or, D. (2010) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1927 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Simoni, S., Zanotti, F., Bertoldi, G., & Rigon, R.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-545
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W1995374229
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop‐FS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.6886
- The paper
- Simoni, S., Zanotti, F., Bertoldi, G., & Rigon, R. (2008). Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop‐FS. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.