The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in snowpack and snowmelt runoff for key mountain regions
Abstract
Mountain snowpack and spring runoff are key components of surface water resources, and serve as important, regionally integrated indicators of climate variability and change. This study examines whether mountain snowpack and snowmelt have manifested a consistent hydrologic response to global climatic changes over the past several decades. Prior findings are compared to identify spatial and temporal patterns of trends in the volume, extent, and seasonality of snowpack and melt for key mountain regions. Evidence suggests that both temperature and precipitation increases to date have impacted mountain snowpacks simultaneously on the global scale; however, the nature of the impact is, among other factors, strongly dependent on geographic location, latitude, and elevation. Warmer temperatures at mid‐elevations have decreased snowpack and resulted in earlier melt in spite of precipitation increases, while they have not affected high‐elevation regions that remain well below freezing during winter. At high elevations, precipitation increases have resulted in increased snowpack. Not all local responses are consistent with the general findings, possibly because of local climatic trends, atmospheric circulation patterns, record lengths, or data quality issues. With continued warming, increasingly higher elevations are projected to experience declines in snowpack accumulation and melt that can no longer be offset by winter precipitation increases. There is a continued research need for hydroclimatic trend detection and attribution in mountains owing to the length, quality, and sparseness of available data from monitoring stations not directly impacted by human activity. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Climate change and plant regeneration from seed
WALCK, J. L., HIDAYATI, S. N., DIXON, K. W., THOMPSON, K., & POSCHLOD, P. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x · Cited by 1,011
A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States
Littell, J. S., Peterson, D. L., Riley, K. L., Liu, Y., & Luce, C. H. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13275 · Cited by 571
Changes in the Timing of Snowmelt and Streamflow in Colorado: A Response to Recent Warming
Clow, D. W. (2010) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2009jcli2951.1 · Cited by 517
Spatial variation of the rain–snow temperature threshold across the Northern Hemisphere
Jennings, K. S., Winchell, T. S., Livneh, B., & Molotch, N. P. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03629-7 · Cited by 444
Terrestrial and Inland Water Systems
(2015) · Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415379.009 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, I. T.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-16
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-94
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2024941759
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in snowpack and snowmelt runoff for key mountain regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.7128
- The paper
- Stewart, I. T. (2009). Changes in snowpack and snowmelt runoff for key mountain regions. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.