The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries
Open accessAbstract
A surge of interest has been brought to all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) as they show great prospects for enabling higher energy density and improved safety compared to conventional liquid batteries. Na Super Ionic CONductors (NaSICONs) proposed by Goodenough and Hong in 1976 are the most promising materials class for Na‐based ASSBs owing to their excellent ion conductivity (>1 mS cm−1), high thermal and chemical/electrochemical stability, as well as good chemical/electrochemical compatibility with electrode materials. The major challenge facing NaSICON‐type electrolytes is the generally high interfacial resistance and thus sluggish charge transfer kinetics across the NaSICON/cathode interface. Great endeavors in the past few years have led to progress in the improvement of the ion‐conducting property, and a dramatic decrease in the NaSICON/electrode interface resistance. Excellent cycling performance and rate capability have been achieved through interface engineering. In this review article, we summarize the state‐of‐the‐art findings for various derivatives of NaSICON structured solid electrolytes, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanism for the improvement of ion conductivity, and the intrinsic reasons for the enhanced interface charge transfer kinetics. These strategies can be readily extended to other solid electrolytes. We hope this review will inspire more work on NaSICON‐type solid electrolytes and solid‐state batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Cited by
Challenges and industrial perspectives on the development of sodium ion batteries
Cai, X., Yue, Y., Yi, Z., Liu, J., Sheng, Y., & Lu, Y. (2024) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110052 · Cited by 336
Huang, J., Wu, K., Xu, G., Wu, M., Dou, S., & Wu, C. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs01029a · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Li, R., Liu, K., Si, R., Zhang, Z., & Hu, Y.
- Venue
- Interdisciplinary Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 396-416
- ISSN
- 2767-4401 (ISSN-L)
- 2767-441X
- OpenAlex
- W4284880204
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/idm2.12044
- The paper
- Li, C., Li, R., Liu, K., Si, R., Zhang, Z., & Hu, Y. (2022). NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries. Interdisciplinary Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.12044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.