Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries

Open access
Li, Chi, Li, Rui, Liu, Kaining, Si, Rui, Zhang, Zhizhen, Hu, Yong‐Sheng·2022·Interdisciplinary Materials

Abstract

A surge of interest has been brought to all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) as they show great prospects for enabling higher energy density and improved safety compared to conventional liquid batteries. Na Super Ionic CONductors (NaSICONs) proposed by Goodenough and Hong in 1976 are the most promising materials class for Na‐based ASSBs owing to their excellent ion conductivity (>1 mS cm−1), high thermal and chemical/electrochemical stability, as well as good chemical/electrochemical compatibility with electrode materials. The major challenge facing NaSICON‐type electrolytes is the generally high interfacial resistance and thus sluggish charge transfer kinetics across the NaSICON/cathode interface. Great endeavors in the past few years have led to progress in the improvement of the ion‐conducting property, and a dramatic decrease in the NaSICON/electrode interface resistance. Excellent cycling performance and rate capability have been achieved through interface engineering. In this review article, we summarize the state‐of‐the‐art findings for various derivatives of NaSICON structured solid electrolytes, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanism for the improvement of ion conductivity, and the intrinsic reasons for the enhanced interface charge transfer kinetics. These strategies can be readily extended to other solid electrolytes. We hope this review will inspire more work on NaSICON‐type solid electrolytes and solid‐state batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/idm2.12044

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., Li, R., Liu, K., Si, R., Zhang, Z., & Hu, Y.
Venue
Interdisciplinary Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
396-416
ISSN
  • 2767-4401 (ISSN-L)
  • 2767-441X
OpenAlex
W4284880204
Cited by
174
References
3
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/idm2.12044
The paper
Li, C., Li, R., Liu, K., Si, R., Zhang, Z., & Hu, Y. (2022). NaSICON: A promising solid electrolyte for solid‐state sodium batteries. Interdisciplinary Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.12044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.