The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health
Open accessAbstract
Ensuring the health of aquatic ecosystems and identifying species at risk from the detrimental effects of environmental contaminants can be facilitated by integrating analytical chemical analysis with carefully selected biological endpoints measured in tissues of species of concern. These biological endpoints include molecular, biochemical, and physiological markers (i.e., biomarkers) that when integrated, can clarify issues of contaminant bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and ecological effects while enabling a better understanding of the effects of nonchemical stressors. In the case of contaminant stressors, an understanding of chemical modes of toxicity can be incorporated with diagnostic markers of aquatic animal physiology to help understand the health status of aquatic organisms in the field. Furthermore, new approaches in functional genomics and bioinformatics can help discriminate individual chemicals, or groups of chemicals among complex mixtures that may contribute to adverse biological effects. Although the use of biomarkers is not a new paradigm, such approaches have been underused in the context of ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment. From a regulatory standpoint, these approaches can help better assess the complex effects from coastal development activities to assessing ecosystem integrity pre- and post development or site remediation. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2014;10:327–341. © 2014 SETAC Key Points Issues of contaminant bioavailability, bioaccumulation and ecological effects can be clarified by integrating molecular, biochemical and physiological markers (i.e. biomarkers). The health of aquatic ecosystems and species in those systems can be monitored by integrating chemical analysis with carefully selected biomarkers. Although biomarkers are not new, they have not been adopted into ecological risk assessment or natural resource damage assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J., Hoff, D. J., Hornung, M. W., Johnson, R. D., Mount, D. R., Nichols, J. W., Russom, C. L., Schmieder, P. K., et al. (2009) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.34 · Cited by 2,734
Widespread Sexual Disruption in Wild Fish
Jobling, S., Nolan, M., Tyler, C. R., Brighty, G., & Sumpter, J. P. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9710870 · Cited by 2,002
Contaminant-stimulated Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Oxidative Damage in Aquatic Organisms
Livingstone, D. R. (2001) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00060-1 · Cited by 1,846
Trace metal concentrations in aquatic invertebrates: why and so what?
Rainbow, P. S. (2002) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00238-5 · Cited by 1,272
AMIARD, J., AMIARDTRIQUET, C., BARKA, S., PELLERIN, J., & RAINBOW, P. (2006) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,186
Biomarkers: Biochemical, Physiological, and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress
Huggett, R. J. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 789
Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) Activity in Fish as a Biomarker of Chemical Exposure
Whyte, J. J., Jung, R. E., Schmitt, C. J., & Tillitt, D. E. (2000) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440091159239 · Cited by 781
Biomarkers: Biochemical, physiological, and histological markers of anthropogenic stress
Cooper, E. L. (1993) · Annual Review of Fish Diseases · doi:10.1016/0959-8030(93)90043-b · Cited by 760
Folmar, L. C., Denslow, N. D., Rao, V., Chow, M., Crain, D. A., Enblom, J., Marcino, J., & Guillette, L. J. (1996) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.961041096 · Cited by 578
Biomarkers of oxidative stress: a comparative study of river Yamuna fish Wallago attu (Bl. & Schn.)
PANDEY, S., PARVEZ, S., SAYEED, I., HAQUE, R., BINHAFEEZ, B., & RAISUDDIN, S. (2003) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00006-8 · Cited by 532
Cited by
Solomando, A., Cohen-Sánchez, A., Box, A., Montero, I., Pinya, S., & Sureda, A. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113369 · Cited by 60
Lombardo, J., Solomando, A., Cohen-Sánchez, A., Pinya, S., Tejada, S., Ferriol, P., Mateu-Vicens, G., Box, A., Faggio, C., & Sureda, A. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23169018 · Cited by 51
“In this sense, oxidative status biomarkers are deemed to be useful to identify the effects of environmental stressors effects in marine organisms [66,67].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hook, S. E., Gallagher, E. P., & Batley, G. E.
- Venue
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-341
- ISSN
- 1551-3777 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-3793
- OpenAlex
- W2148669164
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ieam.1530
- The paper
- Hook, S. E., Gallagher, E. P., & Batley, G. E. (2014). The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.