Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

N‐3 and N‐6 fatty acids in breast adipose tissue and relative risk of breast cancer in a case‐control study in Tours, France

Open access
Maillard, Virginie, Bougnoux, Philippe, Ferrari, Pietro, Jourdan, Marie‐Lise, Pinault, Michelle, Lavillonnière, Flore, Body, Gilles, Le Floch, Olivier, Chajès, Véronique·2002·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Experimental studies have indicated that n‐3 fatty acids, including alpha‐linolenic acid (18:3 n‐3) and long‐chain n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids inhibit mammary tumor growth and metastasis. Earlier epidemiological studies have given inconclusive results about a potential protective effect of dietary n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on breast cancer risk, possibly because of methodological issues inherent to nutritional epidemiology. To evaluate the hypothesis that n‐3 fatty acids protect against breast cancer, we examined the fatty acid composition in adipose tissue from 241 patients with invasive, nonmetastatic breast carcinoma and from 88 patients with benign breast disease, in a case‐control study in Tours, central France. Fatty acid composition in breast adipose tissue was used as a qualitative biomarker of past dietary intake of fatty acids. Biopsies of adipose tissue were obtained at the time of surgery. Individual fatty acids were measured as a percentage of total fatty acids, using capillary gas chromatography. Unconditional logistic regression modeling was used to obtain odds ratio estimates while adjusting for age, height, menopausal status and body mass index. We found inverse associations between breast cancer‐risk and n‐3 fatty acid levels in breast adipose tissue. Women in the highest tertile of alpha‐linolenic acid (18:3 n‐3) had an odds ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.19–0.78) compared to women in the lowest tertile (trend p= 0.01). In a similar way, women in the highest tertile of docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 n‐3) had an odds ratio of 0.31 (95% CI = 0.13‐0.75) compared to women in the lowest tertile (trend p= 0.016). Women in the highest tertile of the long‐chain n‐3/total n‐6 ratio had an odds ratio of 0.33 (95% confidence interval = 0.17–0.66) compared to women in the lowest tertile (trend p= 0.0002). In conclusion, our data based on fatty acids levels in breast adipose tissue suggest a protective effect of n‐3 fatty acids on breast cancer risk and support the hypothesis that the balance between n‐3 and n‐6 fatty acids plays a role in breast cancer. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.10130

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Maillard, V., Bougnoux, P., Ferrari, P., Jourdan, M., Pinault, M., Lavillonnière, F., Body, G., Le Floch, O., & Chajès, V.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
78-83
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1981324020
Cited by
271
References
0
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N‐3 and N‐6 fatty acids in breast adipose tissue and relative risk of breast cancer in a case‐control study in Tours, France. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.10130
The paper
Maillard, V., Bougnoux, P., Ferrari, P., Jourdan, M., Pinault, M., Lavillonnière, F., Body, G., Le Floch, O., & Chajès, V. (2002). N‐3 and N‐6 fatty acids in breast adipose tissue and relative risk of breast cancer in a case‐control study in Tours, France. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.