The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?
Open accessAbstract
Colorectal carcinomas (CRC) that arise proximal (right) or distal (left) to the splenic flexure exhibit differences in incidence according to geographic region, age and gender. Together with observations that tumours in the hereditary cancer syndromes HNPCC and FAP occur predominantly in the right and left colon, respectively, the existence of 2 categories of CRC based on site of origin in the large bowel was proposed more than a decade ago. Differences between normal right and left colonic segments that could favour progression through different tumourigenic pathways are summarized in this review. Accumulating evidence suggests that the risk of CRC conferred by various environmental and genetic factors is different for proximal and distal tumours. Right‐ and left‐sided tumours also exhibit different sensitivities to fluorouracil‐based chemotherapy. Such differences are probably related to the molecular characteristics of the tumours, with the microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotypes being associated with right‐sided tumours and chromosomal instability with left‐sided tumours. Future molecular‐based classification systems for CRC that rely upon distinctive gene expression patterns may allow a clearer discrimination of subgroups than that provided by tumour site alone. Until then however, the existence of 2 broadly different groups of cancer defined by site of origin in the colon should be considered in the design of future epidemiologic studies as well as in the design of new clinical trials aimed at testing novel adjuvant therapies. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic instabilities in human cancers
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/25292 · Cited by 4,168
Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon
Issa, J.-P. J., Ottaviano, Y. L., Celano, P., Hamilton, S. R., Davidson, N. E., & Baylin, S. B. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0894-536 · Cited by 1,191
Mcbain, A. J., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1998) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-47-5-407 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Goding Sauer, A., Fedewa, S. A., Butterly, L. F., Anderson, J. C., Cercek, A., Smith, R. A., & Jemal, A. (2020) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21601 · Cited by 4,880
Rothwell, P. M., Wilson, M., Elwin, C.-E., Norrving, B., Algra, A., Warlow, C. P., & Meade, T. W. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61543-7 · Cited by 1,351
Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer
Baxter, N. N., Goldwasser, M. A., Paszat, L. F., Saskin, R., Urbach, D. R., & Rabeneck, L. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306 · Cited by 1,254
Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: A Population-Based, Case–Control Study
Brenner, H., Chang-Claude, J., Seiler, C. M., Rickert, A., & Hoffmeister, M. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00004 · Cited by 773
Difference Between Left-Sided and Right-Sided Colorectal Cancer: A Focused Review of Literature
Baran, B., Mert Ozupek, N., Yerli Tetik, N., Acar, E., Bekcioglu, O., & Baskin, Y. (2018) · Gastroenterology Research · doi:10.14740/gr1062w · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Iacopetta, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 403-408
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2000435171
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are there two sides to colorectal cancer? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.10635
- The paper
- Iacopetta, B. (2002). Are there two sides to colorectal cancer? International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.