Cited by 159Arsenic contamination and mitigationCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentDNA Repair Mechanisms

Decreased DNA repair gene expression among individuals exposed to arsenic in United States drinking water

Andrew, Angeline S., Karagas, Margaret R., Hamilton, Joshua W.·2003·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Arsenic is well established as a human carcinogen, but its precise mechanism of action remains unknown. Arsenic does not directly damage DNA, but may act as a carcinogen through inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms, leading indirectly to increased mutations from other DNA damaging agents. The molecular mechanism underlying arsenic inhibition of nucleotide excision repair after UV irradiation (Hartwig et al., Carcinogenesis 1997;18:399–405) is unknown, but could be due to decreased expression of critical genes involved in nucleotide excision repair of damaged DNA. This hypothesis was tested by analyzing expression of repair genes and arsenic exposure in a subset of 16 individuals enrolled in a population based case‐control study investigating arsenic exposure and cancer risk in New Hampshire. Toenail arsenic levels were inversely correlated with expression of critical members of the nucleotide excision repair complex, ERCC1 (r2 = 0.82, p < 0.0001), XPF (r2 = 0.56, p < 0.002), and XPB (r2 = 0.75, p < 0.0001). The internal dose marker, toenail arsenic level, was more strongly associated with changes in expression of these genes than drinking water arsenic concentration. Our findings, based on human exposure to arsenic in a US population, show an association between biomarkers of arsenic exposure and expression of DNA repair genes. Although our findings need verification in a larger study group, they are consistent with the hypothesis that inhibition of DNA repair capacity is a potential mechanism for the co‐carcinogenic activity of arsenic. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.10968

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrew, A. S., Karagas, M. R., & Hamilton, J. W.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Andrew, Angeline S.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-04
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
263-268
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2084975830
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 57494, R01CA057494)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES007373, ES-07373)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
arsenic, DNA repair genes, nucleotide excision repair, ERCC1, XPD, XPC, toenail arsenic, drinking water arsenic, biomarkers of exposure, cocarcinogenesis, UV-induced DNA damage, gene expression, cancer risk
MeSH terms
X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1, DNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5, Adult, Aged, Arsenic, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, DNA Repair, DNA Helicases, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Neoplasm, Endonucleases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nails, New Hampshire, Nuclear Proteins, Risk Factors, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Water Pollution, Chemical, Water Supply, Down-Regulation, Gene Expression, Case-Control Studies, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Arsenic Poisoning, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review