The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in incidence of skin basal cell carcinoma. Additional evidence from a UK primary care database study
Open accessAbstract
We determined the trends in incidence of skin basal cell carcinoma (BCC) using a primary care population‐based cohort study in the UK. 11,113 adults with a BCC diagnosis were identified from a total of 7.22 million person‐years of data between 1996 and 2003 from the Health Improvement Network database. From a random subsample of BCC cases identified from the database, 93% were confirmed by hospital letter and/or pathology report. The incidence of BCC was 153.9 per 100,000 person‐years (95% CI 151.1, 156.8) and was slightly higher in men as compared to women (Incidence Rate Ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.06, 1.14). There was a 3% increase year on year across the study period (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01, 1.04), with the largest increase in incidence seen in the 30–39 year age groups, although this did not reach statistical significance. Our study indicates 53,000 new cases of BCC are estimated every year in the UK and figures are continuing to rise on a yearly basis. Incidence rates are highest for men and in particular in the older age categories. These findings are consistent with those reported for various other populations. We have also found an increase in incidence in ages 30–39, which may suggest a cohort effect of increasing ultraviolet exposure in successive younger generations. This may have a huge public and service impact in future years in countries such as the UK, with predominantly fair‐skinned population, with high leisure exposure to ultraviolet light. Our findings underline the need for more elaborate preventive measures. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, N. R., Colver, G. B., & Morton, C. A. (2008) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x · Cited by 960
Cited by
Langan, S. M., Smeeth, L., Hubbard, R., Fleming, K. M., Smith, C. J. P., & West, J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a180 · Cited by 632
Self-citationLangan, S. M., Groves, R. W., Card, T. R., & Gulliford, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2012.130 · Cited by 257
Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.
Chuchu, N., Dinnes, J., Takwoingi, Y., Matin, R. N., Bayliss, S. E., Davenport, C., Moreau, J. F., Bassett, O., Godfrey, K., O'Sullivan, C., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013193 · Cited by 175
Does chronic sunscreen use reduce vitamin D production to insufficient levels?
Norval, M., & Wulf, H. C. (2009) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09332.x · Cited by 169
Recent trends in the incidence of recorded depression in primary care
Rait, G., Walters, K., Griffin, M., Buszewicz, M., Petersen, I., & Nazareth, I. (2009) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058636 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Bath‐Hextall, F., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Smith, C., Meal, A., & Hubbard, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-19
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2105-2108
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1977923680
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in incidence of skin basal cell carcinoma. Additional evidence from a UK primary care database study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.22952
- The paper
- Bath‐Hextall, F., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Smith, C., Meal, A., & Hubbard, R. (2007). Trends in incidence of skin basal cell carcinoma. Additional evidence from a UK primary care database study. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.