The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors and survival of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: A population‐based study
Open accessAbstract
The aim of our study was to provide population‐based data on incidence and prognosis of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis and to evaluate predictors for its development. Diagnosed in 1995–2008, 18,738 cases of primary colorectal cancer were included. Predictors of peritoneal carcinomatosis were analysed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Median survival in months was calculated by site of metastasis. In the study period, 904 patients were diagnosed with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (4.8% of total, constituting 24% of patients presenting with M1 disease). The risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis was increased in case of advanced T stage [T4 vs. T1,2: odds ratio (OR) 4.7, confidence limits 4.0–5.6), advanced N stage [N0 vs. N1,2: OR 0.2 (0.1–0.2)], poor differentiation grade [OR 2.1 (1.8–2.5)], younger age [<60 years vs. 70–79 years: OR 1.4 (1.1–1.7)], mucinous adenocarcinoma [OR 2.0 (1.6–2.4)] and right‐sided localisation of primary tumour [left vs. right: OR 0.6 (0.5–0.7)]. Median survival of patients with peritoneum as single site of metastasis remained dismal [1995–2001: 7 (6–9) months; 2002–2008: 8 (6–11) months], contrasting the improvement among patients with liver metastases [1995–2001: 8 (7–9) months; 2002–2008: 12 (11–14) months]. To conclude, synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer are more frequent among younger patients and among patients with advanced T stage, mucinous adenocarcinoma, right‐sided tumours and tumours that are poorly differentiated. The prognosis of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis remains poor with a median survival of 8 months and even worse if concomitant metastases in other organs are present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Is There a Difference in Survival between Right- versus Left-Sided Colon Cancers?
Meguid, R. A., Slidell, M. B., Wolfgang, C. L., Chang, D. C., & Ahuja, N. (2008) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0015-y · Cited by 546
Cited by
Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype
Hugen, N., van de Velde, C. J. H., de Wilt, J. H. W., & Nagtegaal, I. D. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt591 · Cited by 503
Compton, C. C., Byrd, D. R., Garcia-Aguilar, J., Kurtzman, S. H., Olawaiye, A., & Washington, M. K. (2012) · AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2080-4_14 · Cited by 395
Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications
Alyami, M., Hübner, M., Grass, F., Bakrin, N., Villeneuve, L., Laplace, N., Passot, G., Glehen, O., & Kepenekian, V. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30318-3 · Cited by 331
Colorectal cancer: Metastases to a single organ
Vatandoust, S. (2015) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11767 · Cited by 308
Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer: A Challenge for Personalized Medicine?
Molinari, C., Marisi, G., Passardi, A., Matteucci, L., De Maio, G., & Ulivi, P. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19123733 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemmens, V. E., Klaver, Y. L., Verwaal, V. J., Rutten, H. J., Coebergh, J. W. W., & de Hingh, I. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-13
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2717-2725
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1964319409
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.