The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study
Open accessAbstract
The 70‐gene signature (MammaPrint™) has been developed on retrospective series of breast cancer patients to predict the risk of breast cancer distant metastases. The microarRAy‐prognoSTics‐in‐breast‐cancER (RASTER) study was the first study designed to prospectively evaluate the performance of the 70‐gene signature, which result was available for 427 patients (cT1–3N0M0). Adjuvant systemic treatment decisions were based on the Dutch CBO 2004 guidelines, the 70‐gene signature and doctors' and patients' preferences. Five‐year distant‐recurrence‐free‐interval (DRFI) probabilities were compared between subgroups based on the 70‐gene signature and Adjuvant! Online (AOL) (10‐year survival probability <90% was defined as high‐risk). Median follow‐up was 61.6 months. Fifteen percent (33/219) of the 70‐gene signature low‐risk patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) versus 81% (169/208) of the 70‐gene signature high‐risk patients. The 5‐year DRFI probabilities for 70‐gene signature low‐risk (n = 219) and high‐risk (n = 208) patients were 97.0% and 91.7%. The 5‐year DRFI probabilities for AOL low‐risk (n = 132) and high‐risk (n = 295) patients were 96.7% and 93.4%. For 70‐gene signature low‐risk–AOL high‐risk patients (n = 124), of whom 76% (n = 94) had not received ACT, 5‐year DRFI was 98.4%. In the AOL high‐risk group, 32% (94/295) less patients would be eligible to receive ACT if the 70‐gene signature was used. In this prospective community‐based observational study, the 5‐year DRFI probabilities confirmed the additional prognostic value of the 70‐gene signature to clinicopathological risk estimations such as AOL. Omission of adjuvant chemotherapy as judged appropriate by doctors and patients and instigated by a low‐risk 70‐gene signature result, appeared not to compromise outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Cardoso, F., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rubio, I. T., Zackrisson, S., & Senkus, E. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz173 · Cited by 2,214
Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications
Yersal, O. (2014) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412 · Cited by 1,156
Giuliano, A. E., Connolly, J. L., Edge, S. B., Mittendorf, E. A., Rugo, H. S., Solin, L. J., Weaver, D. L., Winchester, D. J., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21393 · Cited by 961
Duffy, M. J., Harbeck, N., Nap, M., Molina, R., Nicolini, A., Senkus, E., & Cardoso, F. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.017 · Cited by 522
MammaPrint guides treatment decisions in breast Cancer: results of the IMPACt trial
Soliman, H., Shah, V., Srkalovic, G., Mahtani, R., Levine, E., Mavromatis, B., Srinivasiah, J., Kassar, M., Gabordi, R., Qamar, R., et al. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-6534-z · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Drukker, C. A., Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, J. M., Retèl, V. P., van Harten, W. H., van Tinteren, H., Wesseling, J., Roumen, R. M. H., Knauer, M., van 't Veer, L. J., Sonke, G. S., Rutgers, E. J. T., van de Vijver, M. J., & Linn, S. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-04
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 929-936
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2151640153
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.28082
- The paper
- Drukker, C. A., Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, J. M., Retèl, V. P., van Harten, W. H., van Tinteren, H., Wesseling, J., Roumen, R. M. H., Knauer, M., van 't Veer, L. J., Sonke, G. S., Rutgers, E. J. T., van de Vijver, M. J., & Linn, S. C. (2013). A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.