Significantly greater reduction in breast cancer mortality from post-diagnosis running than walking
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of these analyses is to test prospectively whether post‐diagnosis running and walking differ significantly in their association with breast cancer mortality. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to compare breast cancer mortality to baseline exercise energy expenditure (METs, 1 MET‐hour ≅1 km run) in 272 runners and 714 walkers previously diagnosed with breast cancer from the National Runners' and Walkers' Health Studies when adjusted for age, race, menopause, family history, breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use. Diagnosis occurred (mean ± SD) 7.9 ± 7.3 years before baseline. Forty‐six women (13 runners and 33 walkers) died from breast cancer during 9.1‐year mortality surveillance. For the 986 runners and walkers combined, breast cancer mortality decreased an average of 23.9% MET‐hours/day [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9–38.3%; p = 0.004]. There was a significantly greater decrease in risk for running than walking (risk per MET‐hours/day run vs. walked: p = 0.03). For the 272 runners analyzed separately, breast cancer mortality decreased an average of 40.9% per MET‐hours/day run (95% CI: 19.3–60.0%, p = 0.0004). When analyzed by categories of running energy expenditure, breast cancer mortality was 87.4% lower for the 1.8–3.6 MET‐hours/day category (95% CI: 41.3–98.2% lower, p = 0.008) and 95.4% lower for the ≥3.6 MET‐hours/day category (95% CI: 71.9–100% lower, p = 0.0004) compared to the <1.07 MET‐hours/day category. In contrast, the 714 walkers showed a nonsignificant 4.6% decrease in breast cancer mortality per MET‐hours/day walked (95% CI: 27.3% decreased risk to 21.3% increased risk, p = 0.71). These results suggest that post‐diagnosis running is associated with significantly lower breast cancer mortality than post‐diagnosis walking.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only supervised exercise training with planned duration and intensity has demonstrated benefit.
“It seems only supervised ExTr, accounting for planned interventions considering both duration and intensity, has been proven beneficial (3,53-55).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, et al. Phys- ical activity and survival after breast cancer diag- nosis. JAMA 2005;293:2479-86.
- Authors
- Williams, P. T.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Paul T.
- ORCID
- Williams, Paul T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-28
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1195-1202
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1567582191
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- Locations
- International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (HL094717)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- breast cancer mortality, running, walking, exercise energy expenditure, exercise and cancer risk
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Energy Metabolism, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Running, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review