Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus

Klein, George, Dombos, Laszlo, Gothoskar, Balwant·1972·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Twenty‐nine lymphoblastoid lines and one IgE‐producing myeloma line of human origin were exposed to Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) concentrates in vitro. The adsorption of the virus to the outer cell membrane was assessed by counting the number of direct membrane fluorescence‐positive cells immediately after infection and by the direct radioimmune membrane labelling method. Reference reagents were derived for both tests from the same serum (“Agnes”), containing antibodies against EB‐viral envelope and capsid antigens. The intracellular course of infection was followed by counting the number of cells that responded with the development of early antigen (EA) 48 h after infection. The 11 lymphoblastoid lines that produced no EBV‐determined membrane and early antigens adsorbed the virus, although there were quantitative differences between them. EA‐positive cells appeared in significant numbers in only seven of them, however. Four lines remained EA negative in spite of a relatively good adsorbing capacity. The IgE‐producing myeloma line showed neither virus adsorption nor EA development. Eighteen lymphoblastoid lines were “producers”, or “abortive producers”, i.e.a small proportion of the cells continuously generated two or three of the immunofluorescence‐detectable viral antigens, MA, EA and VCA. Nine lines failed to adsorb significant virus quantities and showed no certain increase of EA‐positive cells. The resistance of these lines to superinfection is probably determined at the level of viral receptors. Five lines showed a relatively good virus adsorption, but this was not followed by any significant increase in the number of EA‐positive cells. Four lines showed good adsorption and also responded with a significant increase in the number of EA‐positive cells. The same responses can thus be found to EBV‐superinfection in producer and non‐producer lines, but the producer lines show a strong preponderance of superinfection‐resistant lines with an adsorption block at the receptor level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910100108

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Klein, G., Dombos, L., & Gothoskar, B.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-07-15
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
44-57
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1998980306
Cited by
297
References
0
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910100108
The paper
Klein, G., Dombos, L., & Gothoskar, B. (1972). Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910100108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.