The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus
Abstract
Twenty‐nine lymphoblastoid lines and one IgE‐producing myeloma line of human origin were exposed to Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) concentrates in vitro. The adsorption of the virus to the outer cell membrane was assessed by counting the number of direct membrane fluorescence‐positive cells immediately after infection and by the direct radioimmune membrane labelling method. Reference reagents were derived for both tests from the same serum (“Agnes”), containing antibodies against EB‐viral envelope and capsid antigens. The intracellular course of infection was followed by counting the number of cells that responded with the development of early antigen (EA) 48 h after infection. The 11 lymphoblastoid lines that produced no EBV‐determined membrane and early antigens adsorbed the virus, although there were quantitative differences between them. EA‐positive cells appeared in significant numbers in only seven of them, however. Four lines remained EA negative in spite of a relatively good adsorbing capacity. The IgE‐producing myeloma line showed neither virus adsorption nor EA development. Eighteen lymphoblastoid lines were “producers”, or “abortive producers”, i.e.a small proportion of the cells continuously generated two or three of the immunofluorescence‐detectable viral antigens, MA, EA and VCA. Nine lines failed to adsorb significant virus quantities and showed no certain increase of EA‐positive cells. The resistance of these lines to superinfection is probably determined at the level of viral receptors. Five lines showed a relatively good virus adsorption, but this was not followed by any significant increase in the number of EA‐positive cells. Four lines showed good adsorption and also responded with a significant increase in the number of EA‐positive cells. The same responses can thus be found to EBV‐superinfection in producer and non‐producer lines, but the producer lines show a strong preponderance of superinfection‐resistant lines with an adsorption block at the receptor level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Virus contaminations of cell cultures – A biotechnological view
Merten, O.-W. (2002) · Cytotechnology · doi:10.1023/a:1022969101804 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, G., Dombos, L., & Gothoskar, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1972-07-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-57
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1998980306
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910100108
- The paper
- Klein, G., Dombos, L., & Gothoskar, B. (1972). Sensitivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) producer and non‐producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB‐virus. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910100108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.