Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of human ovarian carcinoma‐associated antigens defined by novel monoclonal antibodies with tumor‐restricted specificity

Miotti, S., Canevari, S., Ménard, S., Mezzanzanica, D., Porro, G., Pupa, S. M., Regazzoni, M., Tagliabue, E., Colnaghi, M. I.·1987·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Three new monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (MOv16, MOv18 and MOv19) were raised against human ovarian carcinoma. To obtain more specific reagents than those produced so far, we adopted the following experimental approach which consisted of: (1) the selection of a poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma which was unreactive with all the MAb previously selected in our laboratory; and (2) the application of a particular immunization protocol. The reactivity of the selected MAbs was studied by solid‐phase RIA on live and fixed cells from tumor cell lines and by immunofluorescence on frozen sections from surgical specimens. The MAb MOv16 reacted with 60% of ovarian carcinomas as well as with a high percentage of other carcinomas and with some normal tissues. In contrast, MOv18 and MOv19 appeared to have restricted specificities for ovarian carcinomas and cystadenomas. Reactivity on other carcinomas was only observed in a few cases and no reactivity was found on non‐epithelial tumors or normal tissues. Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that MOv16 recognizes a 48‐50‐kDA protein, whereas MOv18 and MOv19 both identify a 38‐40 kDA glycoprotein band. Cross‐competition experiments, together with a double‐determinant immunoradiometric assay which uses MOv18 as catcher and MOv19 as tracer, suggested that they recognize different epitopes carried by the same molecule. The affinity constants of MOv18 and MOv19 were estimated to be in the range of 10 8 ‐ 10 9 M‐1. Taken together, the properties of these antibodies, their restricted ovarian tumor specificities and relative high affinity constants, suggest that they could represent promising tools for in vivo applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910390306

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Miotti, S., Canevari, S., Ménard, S., Mezzanzanica, D., Porro, G., Pupa, S. M., Regazzoni, M., Tagliabue, E., & Colnaghi, M. I.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-03-15
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
297-303
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2064525881
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of human ovarian carcinoma‐associated antigens defined by novel monoclonal antibodies with tumor‐restricted specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910390306
The paper
Miotti, S., Canevari, S., Ménard, S., Mezzanzanica, D., Porro, G., Pupa, S. M., Regazzoni, M., Tagliabue, E., & Colnaghi, M. I. (1987). Characterization of human ovarian carcinoma‐associated antigens defined by novel monoclonal antibodies with tumor‐restricted specificity. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910390306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.