The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lung cancer among Chinese women
Abstract
A case‐control stud/involving interviews with 672 female lung cancer patients and 735 population‐based controls was conducted to investigate the high rates of lung cancer, notably adenocarcinoma, among women in Shanghai. Cigarette smok‐ ing was a strong risk factor, but accounted for only about one‐ fourth of all newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer. Most patients, particularly with adenocarcinoma, were life‐long non‐smokers. The risks of lung cancer were higher among women reporting tuberculosis and other pre‐existing lung diseases. Hormonal factors were suggested by an increased risk associated with late menopause and by a gradient in the risk of adenocarcinoma with decreasing menstrual cycle length, with a 3‐fold excess among women who had shorter cycles. Perhaps most intriguing were associations found between lung cancer and measures of exposure to cooking oil vapors. Risks increased with the numbers of meals cooked by either stir frying, deep frying or boiling; with the frequency of smokiness during cooking; and with the frequency of eye irritation during cooking. Use of rapeseed oil, whose volatiles following high‐temperature cooking may be mutagenic, was also re‐ ported more often by the cancer patients. The findings thus confirm that factors other than smoking are responsible for the high risk of lung cancer among Chinese women and provide clues for further research, including the assessment of cooking practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Cited by
Differences in Lung Cancer Risk Between Men and Women: Examination of the Evidence
Zang, E. A., & Wynder, E. L. (1996) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.183 · Cited by 722
The Shanghai Women's Health Study: Rationale, Study Design, and Baseline Characteristics
Zheng, W., Chow, W.-H., Yang, G., Jin, F., Rothman, N., Blair, A., Li, H.-L., Wen, W., Ji, B.-T., Li, Q., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi322 · Cited by 448
Self-citationUltrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking
Dennekamp, M., Howarth, S., Dick, C. A. J., Cherrie, J. W., Donaldson, K., & Seaton, A. (2001) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.58.8.511 · Cited by 323
(2004) · Cited by 220
Indoor air pollution and the lung in low- and medium-income countries
Kurmi, O. P., Lam, K. B. H., & Ayres, J. G. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00190211 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Y., Blot, W. J., Zheng, W., Ersnow, A. G., Hsu, C. W., Levin, L. I., Zhang, R., & Fraumeni, J. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-11-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 604-609
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2092688124
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung cancer among Chinese women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910400505
- The paper
- Gao, Y., Blot, W. J., Zheng, W., Ersnow, A. G., Hsu, C. W., Levin, L. I., Zhang, R., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1987). Lung cancer among Chinese women. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910400505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.