Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Danish case‐control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV‐light exposure

Østerlind, A., Tucker, M. A., Stone, B. J., Jensen, O. M.·1988·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

A population‐based case‐control study of 474 patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma and 926 population controls, conducted in East Denmark over a 3‐year period, included an evaluation of the relationship of UV‐light exposure to cutaneous melanoma risk. Patients with lentigo maligna melanoma were not included. Significantly increased risk was associated with severe sunburn before age 15 (RR = 2. 7 for 5 + vs. never), sunbathing (RR = 1. 6), boating (RR = 1. 4) and vacations spent in the sun (RR = 1. 4 for very sunny vs. never). A significant decrease in risk was associated with occupational exposure during the summer in males (RR = 0. 7), and no association with cutaneous microtopography was seen. These findings were independent of the effects of constitutional risk factors (naevi, freckles and light hair colour). No association was found between the risk of cutaneous melanoma and exposure to artificial UV‐light (fluorescent light, sun lamps, or sun beds). No significant difference was found between superficial spreading melanoma and nodular melanoma with regard to any of the sun exposure variables. Our data indicate that exposure to intermittent intense sunlight is an important risk factor for cutaneous malignant melanoma, while long‐term continuous exposure does not appear to be a risk factor for cutaneous malignant melanoma, while long‐term continuous exposure does not appear to be a risk factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910420303

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Østerlind, A., Tucker, M. A., Stone, B. J., & Jensen, O. M.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-09-15
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
319-324
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2144224521
Cited by
357
References
25
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Danish case‐control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV‐light exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910420303
The paper
Østerlind, A., Tucker, M. A., Stone, B. J., & Jensen, O. M. (1988). The Danish case‐control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV‐light exposure. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910420303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.