Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of a highly invasive and spontaneously metastatic human malignant melanoma cell line

Welch, Danny R., Bisi, J. E., Miller, B. E., Conaway, D., Seftor, E. A., Yohem, K. H., Gilmore, L. B., Seftor, R. E. B., Nakajima, M., Hendrix, Mary J. C.·1991·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Although the incidence of, and deaths due to, malignant melanoma are rising at a rapid rate, few experimental models mimic the highly metastatic properties associated with the pathogenesis of the human disease, making study of the disease difficult. Thus, new human models are required to understand melanoma biology, especially its metastatic properties. Here we describe C8161, a highly invasive and spontaneously metastatic human melanoma cell line, which grows progressively in the subcutis of athymic nude mice with an average doubling time of approximately 6 days. By the time the tumor reaches a diameter of I cm, amelanotic metastases in lymph nodes, skin, peritoneal wall, spleen and lungs have formed. By comparing C8161 to variants from other well‐characterized human malignant melanomas (A375 and MeWo) with differing metastatic traits, properties presumed to be involved in metastatic propensity were examined. C8161 showed a 2‐ to 14‐fold higher ability to invade reconstituted basement membrane barriers in the MICS and correspondingly high type‐IV collagenase mRNA levels and collagenolytic activity, as compared with other melanoma cell lines. Likewise, differential adhesion to immobilized RBM or HUVEC monolayers was observed, but did not correlate to rank orders of malignant properties. Recently, a correlation between surface expression of ICAM‐I and secondary tumor formation by human melanomas has been described in several laboratories. Basal levels of ICAM‐1 on C8161, A375 and MeWo human melanomas were compared, but no correlation with metastatic potential was noted. Proto‐oncogene expression in C8161 cells was compared with A375P and A375M variants using Northern blot analysis, c‐myc expression was 6‐fold greater than both A375 variants; c‐fos expression was 3.4‐fold less than A375P and 1.7‐fold less than A375M; c‐jun in C8161 cells was 2.5‐fold and 2.1‐fold greater than expression in A375P and A375M, respectively. Because C8161 is so highly malignant, amenable to experimental manipulation, and its behavior in nude mice mimics the clinical course of malignant melanoma, this cell line will prove valuable for studying properties associated with human melanoma tumor progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910470211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Welch, D. R., Bisi, J. E., Miller, B. E., Conaway, D., Seftor, E. A., Yohem, K. H., Gilmore, L. B., Seftor, R. E. B., Nakajima, M., & Hendrix, M. J. C.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01-21
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
227-237
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2048408428
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a highly invasive and spontaneously metastatic human malignant melanoma cell line. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910470211
The paper
Welch, D. R., Bisi, J. E., Miller, B. E., Conaway, D., Seftor, E. A., Yohem, K. H., Gilmore, L. B., Seftor, R. E. B., Nakajima, M., & Hendrix, M. J. C. (1991). Characterization of a highly invasive and spontaneously metastatic human malignant melanoma cell line. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910470211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.