Assessment of the expression of the immune checkpoint molecules PD‐1, CTLA4, TIM‐3 and LAG‐3 across different cancers in relation to treatment response, tumor‐infiltrating immune cells and survival
Open accessAbstract
Immune checkpoint molecules have been identified as crucial regulators of the immune response, which motivated the emergence of immune checkpoint‐targeting therapeutic strategies. However, the prognostic significance of the immune checkpoint molecules PD‐1, CTLA4, TIM‐3 and LAG‐3 remains controversial. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic assessment of the expression of these immune checkpoint molecules across different cancers in relation to treatment response, tumor‐infiltrating immune cells and survival. Oncomine and PrognoScan database analyses were used to investigate the expression levels and prognostic values of these immune checkpoint molecule genes across various cancers. Then, we used Kaplan–Meier plotter to validate the associations between the checkpoint molecules and cancer survival identified in the PrognoScan analysis. TIMER analysis was used to evaluate immune cell infiltration data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Finally, we used Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis to investigate the prognostic value of these four checkpoint molecules and assess the correlations between these four checkpoint molecules and genetic markers. These immune checkpoint molecules may potentially serve as prognostic factors and therapeutic targets in breast cancer, ovarian cancer and lung cancer. The prognostic roles of these checkpoint molecules varied greatly across cancers, which implied a noteworthy amount of heterogeneity among tumors, even within the same molecular subtype. In addition, the expression patterns of these checkpoint molecules were closely associated with treatment response and provided some useful direction when choosing chemotherapeutic drugs. These findings enhance our understanding of these checkpoints in cancer treatment and identify strategies to promote synergistic activities in the context of other immunotherapies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No significant differences in the expression of LAG-3 and TIM-3 were observed between TGCTs, ovarian cancer, and their corresponding normal adjacent tissues.
“However, no significant differences in the expression of LAG-3 and TIM-3 were observed between TGCTs, ovarian cancer, and their corresponding normal adjacent tissues [61].”
From The Immune Landscape and Immunotherapeutic Strategies in Platinum-Refractory Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance
Tumeh, P. C., Harview, C. L., Yearley, J. H., Shintaku, I. P., Taylor, E. J. M., Robert, L., Chmielowski, B., Spasic, M., Henry, G., Ciobanu, V., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13954 · Cited by 6,609 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Previous studies showed that increased release of PD-1 from activated T cells could promote T cell proliferation and enhance T cell effector functions.(16) Considering the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, PD-1 alonemay not indicate the immunosuppressive or activated status of the immune response.”
ResultT cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1–mediated inhibition
Hui, E., Cheung, J., Zhu, J., Su, X., Taylor, M. J., Wallweber, H. A., Sasmal, D. K., Huang, J., Kim, J. M., Mellman, I., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1292 · Cited by 1,689 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evmorfopoulos, K., Marsitopoulos, K., Karachalios, R., Karathanasis, A., Dimitropoulos, K., Tzortzis, V., Zachos, I., & Vlachostergios, P. J. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16020428 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“However, no significant differences in the expression of LAG-3 and TIM-3 were observed between TGCTs, ovarian cancer, and their corresponding normal adjacent tissues [61].”
Background
- Authors
- Tu, L., Guan, R., Yang, H., Zhou, Y., Hong, W., Ma, L., Zhao, G., & Yu, M.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
- Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Min
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-02
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 423-439
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2986360475
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81701560)
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313530, 2014A030310073)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
- Keywords
- immune checkpoint molecules, PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, cancer prognosis, treatment response, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, cancer survival, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2, Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3 Protein, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Antigens, CD, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Treatment Outcome, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, CTLA-4 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review