Cited by 100Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Clinical impact of probiotics on the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 monotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective survival analysis study with inverse probability of treatment weighting

Open access
Takada, Kazuki, Shimokawa, Mototsugu, Takamori, Shinkichi, Shimamatsu, Shinichiro, Hirai, Fumihiko, Tagawa, Tetsuzo, Okamoto, Tatsuro, Hamatake, Motoharu +8 more·2021·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The gastrointestinal microbiota was reported as an important factor for the response to cancer immunotherapy. Probiotics associated with gastrointestinal dysbiosis and bacterial richness may affect the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy drugs. However, the clinical impact of probiotics on the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly understood. The outcomes of 294 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received antiprogrammed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy) at three medical centers in Japan were analyzed in our study. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to minimize the bias arising from the patients' backgrounds. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that progression-free survival (nonuse vs use: hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 1.73 [1.42-2.11], log-rank test P = .0229), but not overall survival (nonuse vs use: HR [95%CI] = 1.40 [1.13-1.74], log-rank test P = .1835), was significantly longer in patients who received probiotics. Moreover, the IPTW-adjusted univariate analyses showed that nonuse or use of probiotics was significantly associated with disease control (nonuse vs use: odds ratio [OR] [95%CI] = 0.51 [0.35-0.74], P = .0004) and overall response (nonuse vs use: OR [95%CI] = 0.43 [0.29-0.63], P < .0001). In this multicenter and retrospective study, probiotics use was associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The findings should be validated in a future prospective study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.33557

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some bacterial strains and species have already been found to enhance ICB efficacy.

    “Some bacterial strains and species have already been found to enhance ICB efficacy.”

    From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Takada et al., 2021

  • Supplementing patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with probiotics (specifically Clostridium butyricum) alongside anti-PD-1 monotherapy significantly improved disease control and PFS, and more so in patients who took antibiotics.

    “Additionally, a multicenter analysis in Japan concluded that supplementing patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with probiotics (specifically Clostridium butyricum, which is expected to generate a dominance of Bifidobacterium spp.) alongside anti-PD-1 monotherapy significantly improved disease control and PFS, and more so in patients who took antibiotics (Takada et al., 2021).”

    From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Takada et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 100

Authors
Takada, K., Shimokawa, M., Takamori, S., Shimamatsu, S., Hirai, F., Tagawa, T., Okamoto, T., Hamatake, M., Tsuchiya‐Kawano, Y., Otsubo, K., Inoue, K., Yoneshima, Y., Tanaka, K., Okamoto, I., Nakanishi, Y., & Mori, M.
Affiliations
  • Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center (JP)
  • Yamaguchi University (JP)
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takada, Kazuki
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-26
Volume
149
Issue
2
Pages
473-482
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W3137973996
Cited by
100
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20K16432)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, non-small cell lung cancer, anti-PD-1 monotherapy, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cancer immunotherapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control, gut microbiota, gut dysbiosis, bacterial richness
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Nivolumab, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Drug Synergism, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, B7-H1 Antigen, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review