Cited by 62Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases

Open access
Reinert, Thomas, Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj, Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman, Larsen, Marie Øbo, Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov, Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll, Øgaard, Nadia, Knudsen, Michael +6 more·2022·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse ( P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative ( P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.33924

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 62

Authors
Reinert, T., Petersen, L. M. S., Henriksen, T. V., Larsen, M. Ø., Rasmussen, M. H., Johansen, A. F. B., Øgaard, N., Knudsen, M., Nordentoft, I., Vang, S., Krag, S. R. P., Knudsen, A. R., Mortensen, F. V., & Andersen, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Department of Molecular Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Corresponding author
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
150
Issue
9
Pages
1537-1548
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W4206091813
Cited by
62
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse (R107‐A7035, R133‐A8520‐00‐S41, R146‐A9466‐16‐S2, R257‐A14700)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0012747)
  • Strategiske Forskningsråd (1309‐00006B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
circulating tumor DNA, colorectal liver metastases, recurrence risk prediction, postoperative follow-up, curative resection, somatic mutations, droplet digital PCR, minimal residual disease, carcinoembryonic antigen, positive predictive value, time to recurrence
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Longitudinal Studies, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review