Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
Open accessAbstract
The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse ( P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative ( P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The detection of ctDNA after curative intent therapy helps to identify disease recurrence or risk of recurrence ahead of current methods.
“The detection of ctDNA after curative intent therapy helps to identify disease recurrence or risk of recurrence ahead of current methods [ 22 ].”
From Establishing a Common Lexicon for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis and Molecular Residual Disease: Insights From the BLOODPAC Consortium (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Reinert, T., Petersen, L. M. S., Henriksen, T. V., Larsen, M. Ø., Rasmussen, M. H., Johansen, A. F. B., Øgaard, N., Knudsen, M., Nordentoft, I., Vang, S., Krag, S. R. P., Knudsen, A. R., Mortensen, F. V., & Andersen, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Department of Molecular Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-19
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1537-1548
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- PMC
- PMC9303459
- OpenAlex
- W4206091813
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kræftens Bekæmpelse (R107‐A7035, R133‐A8520‐00‐S41, R146‐A9466‐16‐S2, R257‐A14700)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0012747)
- Strategiske Forskningsråd (1309‐00006B)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Keywords
- circulating tumor DNA, colorectal liver metastases, recurrence risk prediction, postoperative follow-up, curative resection, somatic mutations, droplet digital PCR, minimal residual disease, carcinoembryonic antigen, positive predictive value, time to recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Circulating Tumor DNA, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Longitudinal Studies, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review