Cited by 5Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Evaluation of effectiveness, acceptability and safety of thermal ablation in the treatment of cervical neoplasia in Burundi

Sauvaget, Catherine, Bazikamwe, Sylvestre, Lucas, Eric, Ndayikengurukiye, Athanase, Harerimana, Salvator, Barango, Prebo·2022·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

This longitudinal study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness, acceptability and safety of the thermal ablation procedure (TA) in the treatment of cervical neoplasia. Women referred to the Gynaecology ward for symptoms or for opportunistic screening were assessed by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and colposcopy. Those with lesions eligible to ablation were counselled and treated by TA. They were inquired about the level of pain during the procedure, and their level of satisfaction. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks for any complication and reassessed by VIA and colposcopy at 12 months for any persistent or recurrent lesion and for any adverse event. A total of 86 women with a positive VIA test were included in the study. The mean age was 46 years (28‐61 years). Most of the women did not complain about any adverse event during treatment; one‐third presented mild pain or cramp. At the 6‐week visit, watery discharge was the main adverse event reported. All women were highly satisfied with TA and most of them would recommend it. At the 12‐month visit, 82 women were examined (95% follow‐up rate), and the overall cure rate was 96% (low‐grade lesions: 98%; high‐grade lesions: 94%). Three women presented low‐ and high‐grade lesions that were treated by TA. No major adverse event or hospitalisation after the treatment was reported. In conclusion, TA was an effective procedure with a high cure rate at the 1‐year follow‐up visit. It was acceptable and safe, with only minor short‐term side‐effects reported and with a high satisfaction rate among the patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.34117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thermal ablation is one of the main recommended methods by the WHO for the treatment of cervical precancerous lesions, due to its accessibility, affordability and effectiveness.

    “This is particularly relevant in low‐income contexts where TA is one of the main recommended methods by the WHO for the treatment of cervical precancerous lesions, due to its accessibility, affordability and effectiveness [3, 6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sauvaget, C., Bazikamwe, S., Lucas, E., Ndayikengurukiye, A., Harerimana, S., & Barango, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Université du Burundi (BI)
  • World Health Organization - Zimbabwe (ZW)
Corresponding author
Sauvaget, Catherine
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-03
Volume
151
Issue
7
Pages
1120-1126
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W4280511533
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
thermal ablation, cervical neoplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, visual inspection with acetic acid, colposcopy, cure rate, treatment safety, patient acceptability, patient satisfaction, adverse events, resource-limited settings, Burundi
MeSH terms
Burundi, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Pain, Pregnancy, Acetic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review