Cited by 39Microfinance and Financial InclusionFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Does digital financial inclusion reduce the risk of returning to poverty? Evidence from China

Open access
Xu, Fang, Zhang, Xiaoru, Zhou, Di·2024·International Journal of Finance & Economics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Digital financial inclusion has become an important way to reduce poverty and prevent poverty return; however, few studies examine the relationship between digital financial inclusion measurement with poverty return governance. Based on data from the 2017 China Household Financial Survey, we construct a digital financial inclusion indicator for micro‐households, and explore its impact on the risk of households returning to poverty and its mechanisms. Our findings suggest that digital financial inclusion can reduce the risk of Chinese families returning to poverty, and that it has heterogeneous effects on families and regions with different characteristics. The main function is to improve household income level by promoting entrepreneurship and employment, and to improve risk resistance by enhancing household financial market participation and household asset allocation. Further analysis shows that digital financial inclusion has structural effects, nonlinear effects, and substitution effects with private lending in poverty governance. This paper has implications for understanding and improving the poverty governance effectiveness of digital financial inclusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijfe.2812

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital financial inclusion improves household income levels by promoting entrepreneurship and employment.

    “Xu et al. (2023) found that digital financial inclusion improves household income levels by promoting entrepreneurship and employment [53].”

    From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, F., Zhang, X., & Zhou, D.
Affiliations
  • Hubei University (CN)
  • Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Di
Venue
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-04
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
2927-2949
ISSN
  • 1076-9307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1158
OpenAlex
W4362528229
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Finance & Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72003049)
  • National Social Science Fund of China (18BTJ011)
  • Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20YJC790191)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515110400, 2022A1515010998)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
digital financial inclusion, poverty governance, household income, entrepreneurship, employment, asset allocation, risk resistance, private lending, heterogeneous effects, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review