Does digital financial inclusion reduce the risk of returning to poverty? Evidence from China
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Digital financial inclusion has become an important way to reduce poverty and prevent poverty return; however, few studies examine the relationship between digital financial inclusion measurement with poverty return governance. Based on data from the 2017 China Household Financial Survey, we construct a digital financial inclusion indicator for micro‐households, and explore its impact on the risk of households returning to poverty and its mechanisms. Our findings suggest that digital financial inclusion can reduce the risk of Chinese families returning to poverty, and that it has heterogeneous effects on families and regions with different characteristics. The main function is to improve household income level by promoting entrepreneurship and employment, and to improve risk resistance by enhancing household financial market participation and household asset allocation. Further analysis shows that digital financial inclusion has structural effects, nonlinear effects, and substitution effects with private lending in poverty governance. This paper has implications for understanding and improving the poverty governance effectiveness of digital financial inclusion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital financial inclusion improves household income levels by promoting entrepreneurship and employment.
“Xu et al. (2023) found that digital financial inclusion improves household income levels by promoting entrepreneurship and employment [53].”
From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors
Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1849 · Cited by 2,152 · see citing works
Who creates jobs in developing countries?
Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2014) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9549-5 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth
Xi, W., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19731 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Xu et al. (2023) found that digital financial inclusion improves household income levels by promoting entrepreneurship and employment [53].”
- Authors
- Xu, F., Zhang, X., & Zhou, D.
- Affiliations
- Hubei University (CN)
- Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Di
- Venue
- International Journal of Finance & Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2927-2949
- ISSN
- 1076-9307 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1158
- OpenAlex
- W4362528229
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Finance & Economics (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (72003049)
- National Social Science Fund of China (18BTJ011)
- Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20YJC790191)
- Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515110400, 2022A1515010998)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Keywords
- digital financial inclusion, poverty governance, household income, entrepreneurship, employment, asset allocation, risk resistance, private lending, heterogeneous effects, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review