Association between maternal e‐cigarette use during pregnancy and low gestational weight gain
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the risk of low gestational weight gain (GWG) in women who use electronic cigarettes (e‐cigarettes), combustible cigarettes, or both e‐cigarettes and combustible cigarettes (dual use) during pregnancy. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the data from 176 882 singleton pregnancies in the 2016–2020 US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Postpartum women self‐reported their use of e‐cigarettes and/or cigarettes during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Low GWG was defined as the total GWG less than 12.7 kg, less than 11.3 kg, less than 6.8 kg, and less than 5.0 kg (<28, <25, <15, and < 11 lb) for women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of low GWG, adjusting for confounders. Results: In this national sample, 921 (weighted percentage, 0.5%) of women were e‐cigarette users and 1308 (0.7%) were dual users during late pregnancy. Compared with non‐users during late pregnancy (40 090, 22.1%), cigarette users (4499, 28.0%) and dual users (427, 26.0%) had a higher risk of low GWG, but e‐cigarette users had a similar risk (237, 22.1%). Adjustment for sociodemographic and pregnancy confounders moderately attenuated these associations: confounder‐adjusted ORs 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.35) for cigarette users, 1.18 (95% CI 0.96–1.44) for dual users, and 0.99 (95% CI 0.78–1.27) for e‐cigarette users. Conclusions: Unlike combustible cigarette use, e‐cigarette use during late pregnancy does not appear to be a risk factor for low GWG.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was no evidence of increased risk for exclusive-vaping compared with non-use for low gestational weight gain.
“there was no evidence of increased risk for exclusive-vaping compared with non-use for low gestational weight gain [55]”
From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Six studies examined specific maternal pregnancy or postpartum outcomes.
“Six studies examined specific maternal pregnancy or postpartum outcomes [16,36,47,51,55,56, see Table 4].”
From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
There was evidence of similar risk for exclusive-vaping vs exclusive-smoking for low gestational weight gain.
“There was evidence of a similar risk for exclusive-vaping vs exclusive-smoking for low gestational weight gain [55]”
From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Active Smoking and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Willi, C., Bodenmann, P., Ghali, W. A., Faris, P. D., & Cornuz, J. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2654 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Smoking cessation and weight gain
Filozof, C., Fernández Pinilla, M. C., & Fernández‐Cruz, A. (2004) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2004.00131.x · Cited by 519 · see citing works
E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated With E-Cigarette Use Among US Youth
Mantey, D. S., Cooper, M. R., Clendennen, S. L., Pasch, K. E., & Perry, C. L. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.003 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Adverse Birth Outcomes Associated With Prepregnancy and Prenatal Electronic Cigarette Use
Regan, A. K., Bombard, J. M., O’Hegarty, M. M., Smith, R. A., & Tong, V. T. (2021) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004432 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pesola, F., Smith, K. M., Phillips‐Waller, A., Przulj, D., Griffiths, C., Walton, R., McRobbie, H., Coleman, T., Lewis, S., Whitemore, R., et al. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16422 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes.
Ussher, M., Fleming, J., & Brose, L. (2024) · BMC pregnancy and childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06633-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Comparisons Nine studies compared outcomes for all four groups key groups: exclusive-smokers, exclusive-vapers, dual-users and non-users [32, 34, 35, 42, 44, 46, 47, 53, 55].”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Wen, X., Thomas, M. A., Liu, L., Moe, A. A., Duong, P. H., Griffiths, M. E., & Munlyn, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wen, Xiaozhong
- ORCID
- Wen, Xiaozhong
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-02-04
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 300-308
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- PMC
- PMC10523399
- OpenAlex
- W4315928027
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA053638)
- Center for Tobacco Products
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Keywords
- electronic cigarettes, maternal smoking, pregnancy outcomes, PRAMS
- MeSH terms
- Vaping, Gestational Weight Gain, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Body Mass Index, Overweight, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review