Cited by 19Smoking Behavior and CessationPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Association between maternal e‐cigarette use during pregnancy and low gestational weight gain

Open access
Wen, Xiaozhong, Thomas, Marjorie A., Liu, Lufeiya, Moe, Aye A., Duong, Peter H., Griffiths, Malkijah E., Munlyn, Ambra L.·2023·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the risk of low gestational weight gain (GWG) in women who use electronic cigarettes (e‐cigarettes), combustible cigarettes, or both e‐cigarettes and combustible cigarettes (dual use) during pregnancy. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the data from 176 882 singleton pregnancies in the 2016–2020 US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Postpartum women self‐reported their use of e‐cigarettes and/or cigarettes during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Low GWG was defined as the total GWG less than 12.7 kg, less than 11.3 kg, less than 6.8 kg, and less than 5.0 kg (<28, <25, <15, and < 11 lb) for women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of low GWG, adjusting for confounders. Results: In this national sample, 921 (weighted percentage, 0.5%) of women were e‐cigarette users and 1308 (0.7%) were dual users during late pregnancy. Compared with non‐users during late pregnancy (40 090, 22.1%), cigarette users (4499, 28.0%) and dual users (427, 26.0%) had a higher risk of low GWG, but e‐cigarette users had a similar risk (237, 22.1%). Adjustment for sociodemographic and pregnancy confounders moderately attenuated these associations: confounder‐adjusted ORs 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.35) for cigarette users, 1.18 (95% CI 0.96–1.44) for dual users, and 0.99 (95% CI 0.78–1.27) for e‐cigarette users. Conclusions: Unlike combustible cigarette use, e‐cigarette use during late pregnancy does not appear to be a risk factor for low GWG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.14672

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no evidence of increased risk for exclusive-vaping compared with non-use for low gestational weight gain.

    “there was no evidence of increased risk for exclusive-vaping compared with non-use for low gestational weight gain [55]”
  • Six studies examined specific maternal pregnancy or postpartum outcomes.

    “Six studies examined specific maternal pregnancy or postpartum outcomes [16,36,47,51,55,56, see Table 4].”
  • There was evidence of similar risk for exclusive-vaping vs exclusive-smoking for low gestational weight gain.

    “There was evidence of a similar risk for exclusive-vaping vs exclusive-smoking for low gestational weight gain [55]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, X., Thomas, M. A., Liu, L., Moe, A. A., Duong, P. H., Griffiths, M. E., & Munlyn, A. L.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Wen, Xiaozhong
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-04
Volume
162
Issue
1
Pages
300-308
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W4315928027
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA053638)
  • Center for Tobacco Products
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, maternal smoking, pregnancy outcomes, PRAMS
MeSH terms
Vaping, Gestational Weight Gain, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Body Mass Index, Overweight, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review