Effectiveness of a structured exercise intervention in gestational weight gain in pregnant women with overweight and obesity: A systematic review with meta‐analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of exercise interventions during pregnancy in managing gestational weight gain (GWG), excessive GWG, gestational diabetes (GD), hypertensive disorders, 2‐h post–oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and birth weight in pregnant women with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). Methods: The search strategy was conducted in five electronic databases, restricting to articles published within the past 10 years. Randomized controlled trials comparing exercise intervention with usual prenatal care in pregnant women with OW/OB were considered. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using version 2 of the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for randomized trials and the quality of studies using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation classification. Continuous data were calculated as mean differences (MDs) and dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs). Results: Seven trials comprising 1648 pregnant women were included. Exercise interventions were associated with lower GWG (MD, −1.19 kg [95% confidence interval, CI, −1.79 to −0.60]) and lower incidence of GD (RR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40–0.78]). When analyzing excessive GWG, 2‐h post‐OGTT, birth weight, and hypertensive disorders, there was no statistically significant difference between the exercise and usual care groups. The strength of evidence was considered moderate. Conclusion: Exercise interventions during pregnancy in women with OW/OB were shown to influence GWG and the incidence of GD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bernardo DS et al., consistent with our results, did not conclude a significant effect on excessive weight gain.
“Bernardo DS [24] et al., consistent with our results, also did not conclude the existence of a significant effect on excessive weight gain.”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based intervention to prevent gestational diabetes in women with overweight or obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898 · Cited by 33,583 · see citing works
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
Piercy, K. L., Troiano, R. P., Ballard, R. M., Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Galuska, D. A., George, S. M., & Olson, R. D. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14854 · Cited by 9,755 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Montori, V., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Djulbegovic, B., Atkins, D., Falck-Ytter, Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
Practice Bulletin No 156: Obesity in Pregnancy
(2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001211 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Dempsey, J. C., Butler, C. L., Sorensen, T. K., Lee, I.-M., Thompson, M. L., Miller, R. S., Frederick, I. O., & Williams, M. A. (2004) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2004.03.010 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santa Cruz, T. E., Sarasqueta, C., Muruzábal, J. C., Ansuategui, E., & Sanz, O. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-07021-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bernardo, D. S., Carvalho, C. B., Conde, M., Mota, J. A., & Santos, P. C.
- Affiliations
- KinesioLab Research Unit in Human Movement, Department of Physiotherapy School of Health, Piaget Institute Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal
- Sword Health, SA (Portugal) (PT)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-18
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 811-822
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W4321749396
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UI/BD/151206/2021, UID/DTP/00617/2020)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- exercise intervention, gestational weight gain, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, birth weight, oral glucose tolerance test, prenatal care
- MeSH terms
- Gestational Weight Gain, Birth Weight, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review