Cited by 67Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

THE PRENATAL PARENTAL REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING QUESTIONNAIRE: EXPLORING FACTOR STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW MEASURE IN THE FINN BRAIN BIRTH COHORT PILOT STUDY: Prenatal Mentalization Self-Report

Pajulo, Marjukka, Tolvanen, Mimmi, Karlsson, Linnea, Halme-Chowdhury, Elina, Öst, Camilla, Luyten, Patrick, Mayes, Linda, Karlsson, Hasse·2015·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Parental reflective functioning (PRF) is the capacity to focus on experience and feelings in oneself and in the child. Individual differences in PRF reportedly affect child attachment and socioemotional development. In this study, we report work on developing a questionnaire to assess PRF during pregnancy (Prenatal Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire; P-PRFQ). The factor structure of the 33-item version of the P-PRFQ was explored using pilot study data from the Finn Brain Birth Cohort Study (n = 124 mothers, n = 82 fathers). Construct validity was assessed against the Pregnancy Interview (PI; A. Slade, L. Grunebaum, L. Huganir, & M. Reeves, 1987, 2002, 2011) in a subsample of 29 mothers from the same pilot sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a 14-item P-PRFQ, with three factors which seem to capture relevant aspects of prenatal parental mentalization-F1: "Opacity of mental states," F2: "Reflecting on the fetus-child," and F3: "The dynamic nature of the mental states." Functioning of the factor structure was further tested in the large cohort with 600 mothers and 600 fathers. Correlations with the PI result were high, both regarding total and factor scores of the P-PRFQ. Cost-effective tools to assess key areas of early parenting are needed for both research and clinical purposes. The 14-item P-PRFQ seems to be an applicable and promising new tool for assessing very early parental mentalizing capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21523

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 67

Authors
Pajulo, M., Tolvanen, M., Karlsson, L., Halme-Chowdhury, E., Öst, C., Luyten, P., Mayes, L., & Karlsson, H.
Affiliations
  • Research Council of Finland (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • University of Turku and National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Pajulo, Marjukka
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-19
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
399-414
ISSN
0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1776609787
Cited by
67
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Finnish Medical Association
  • Foundation of Turku University
  • Hospital District of South-Western Finland
  • International Psychonalaytic Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
parental reflective functioning, factor structure, construct validity, prenatal attachment, parenting assessment, parents
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Object Attachment, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review