THE PRENATAL PARENTAL REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING QUESTIONNAIRE: EXPLORING FACTOR STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW MEASURE IN THE FINN BRAIN BIRTH COHORT PILOT STUDY: Prenatal Mentalization Self-Report
Abstract
Parental reflective functioning (PRF) is the capacity to focus on experience and feelings in oneself and in the child. Individual differences in PRF reportedly affect child attachment and socioemotional development. In this study, we report work on developing a questionnaire to assess PRF during pregnancy (Prenatal Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire; P-PRFQ). The factor structure of the 33-item version of the P-PRFQ was explored using pilot study data from the Finn Brain Birth Cohort Study (n = 124 mothers, n = 82 fathers). Construct validity was assessed against the Pregnancy Interview (PI; A. Slade, L. Grunebaum, L. Huganir, & M. Reeves, 1987, 2002, 2011) in a subsample of 29 mothers from the same pilot sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a 14-item P-PRFQ, with three factors which seem to capture relevant aspects of prenatal parental mentalization-F1: "Opacity of mental states," F2: "Reflecting on the fetus-child," and F3: "The dynamic nature of the mental states." Functioning of the factor structure was further tested in the large cohort with 600 mothers and 600 fathers. Correlations with the PI result were high, both regarding total and factor scores of the P-PRFQ. Cost-effective tools to assess key areas of early parenting are needed for both research and clinical purposes. The 14-item P-PRFQ seems to be an applicable and promising new tool for assessing very early parental mentalizing capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The P-PRFQ has shown good initial psychometric properties.
“The P-PRFQ has shown good initial psychometric properties [4].”
The initial validation study of the P-PRFQ showed a three-factor structure (F1: Opacity of mental states; F2: Reflecting on the fetus-child; and F3: The dynamic nature of the mental states) and suggested it could be a valid and promising new instrument for assessing parental reflective functioning during pregnancy.
“The initial validation study showed a three-factor structure (F1: “Opacity of mental states”; F2: “Reflecting on the fetus-child”; and F3: “The dynamic nature of the mental states”) and suggested it could be a valid and promising new instrument for assessing parental reflective functioning during pregnancy.”
From Mentalizing makes parenting work: a review about parental reflective functioning and clinical interventions to improve it (2017) · cites this paper as Pajulo et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Pajulo, M., Tolvanen, M., Karlsson, L., Halme-Chowdhury, E., Öst, C., Luyten, P., Mayes, L., & Karlsson, H.
- Affiliations
- Research Council of Finland (FI)
- University of Turku (FI)
- University of Turku and National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pajulo, Marjukka
- Venue
- Infant Mental Health Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-414
- ISSN
- 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1776609787
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- WOS
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Finnish Medical Association
- Foundation of Turku University
- Hospital District of South-Western Finland
- International Psychonalaytic Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- parental reflective functioning, factor structure, construct validity, prenatal attachment, parenting assessment, parents
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Object Attachment, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review