Cited by 21Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHomelessness and Social IssuesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

“I'M OPENING MY ARMS RATHER THAN PUSHING AWAY:” PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF A MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTION AMONG HOMELESS WOMEN AND YOUNG CHILDREN: Perceived Benefits of a Minfulness Intervention

Open access
Alhusen, Jeanne L., Norris-Shortle, Carole, Cosgrove, Kim, Marks, Lauren·2017·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Family homelessness is associated with adverse outcomes in mothers and their young children. Evidence-based programs are needed to support the socioemotional needs of these families. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the perceived benefits of participating in a mindfulness program in mother-child dyads receiving services at a therapeutic nursery serving homeless children under the age of 3 years. A convenience sample of 17 predominantly African American mothers participated in in-depth qualitative interviews. Four themes were derived from the data regarding the perceived benefits of the mindfulness program: "me" time, maternal self-regulation, dyadic connectedness, and child well-being. Results demonstrate the perceived benefits of mindfulness on the parent-child relationship and have important implications for families at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Because homelessness and residential instability confer considerable risk for young children, interventions to support effective parenting are critical.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21641

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 21

Authors
Alhusen, J. L., Norris-Shortle, C., Cosgrove, K., & Marks, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • PACT's Therapeutic Nurseries
Corresponding author
Alhusen, Jeanne L.
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
434-442
ISSN
0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611726795
Cited by
21
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (K23NR015810)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, family homelessness, homeless mothers, young children, parent-child relationship, child well-being, parenting support, African American mothers, residential instability
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Preschool, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Infant, Interviews as Topic, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Perception, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Vulnerable Populations, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review