Cited by 22Family and Disability Support ResearchMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Development and Preterm Care

Efficacy of interventions to improve psychological adjustment for parents of infants with or at risk of neurodevelopmental disability: A systematic review

Dickinson, Corrine, Whittingham, Koa, Sheffield, Jeanie, Wotherspoon, Jane, Boyd, Roslyn N·2020·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Background Supportive and targeted interventions for families are required to optimize parental adjustment and the parent-infant relationship in line with earlier diagnosis of neurodevelopmental risk for infants. Aims The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of interventions in improving psychological adjustment and well-being for parents who have an infant diagnosed with or at risk of neurodevelopmental disability. Methods The Cochrane Review Group search strategy was followed with search of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase between July and December 2017. Methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale by two independent reviewers. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. A small number of high-quality trials demonstrated moderate to large effectiveness of reducing adverse parent psychological symptoms of trauma and stress. Significant improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms emerged at longer-term (6 months to 8 years) follow-up postinterventions. Conclusions There is promising support for the effectiveness of some interventions to reduce maladaptive psychological symptoms in parents with infants diagnosed at risk of neurodevelopmental disability. Further quality RCTs of psychological interventions addressing broader neurodevelopmental risk conditions for infants are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21871

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 22

Authors
Dickinson, C., Whittingham, K., Sheffield, J., Wotherspoon, J., & Boyd, R. N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Dickinson, Corrine
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
697-722
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W3037211051
Cited by
22
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
neurodevelopmental disorders, high-risk infants, parental adjustment, parent-infant relationship, family intervention, parental depression, parental anxiety, post-traumatic stress, intervention efficacy, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adult, Behavioral Symptoms, Humans, Infant, Parents, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disabled Children, Children with Disabilities, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review