Cited by 16Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and Development

Improving mother–infant interaction during infant feeding: A randomised controlled trial in a low‐income community in South Africa

Tomlinson, Mark, Rabie, Stephan, Skeen, Sarah, Hunt, Xanthe, Murray, Lynne, Cooper, Peter J·2020·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Background: Maternal–infant feeding interactions are a primary context for engagement between mothers and their infants, and constitute a unique space in which reciprocity, attunement and maternal sensitivity can be expressed. Increasingly, research demonstrates the importance of the psychological and social nature of the feeding context, and how it may be affected by maternal mental state, feeding skills and sensitivity. As such, feeding interactions may provide useful contexts for observations of maternal sensitivity, reflecting well on day‐to‐day maternal sensitivity. Aims and Objectives: This paper is a post hoc examination of the impact of an intervention on maternal sensitivity during a feeding interaction when the infants were 6 months old. Participants: A total of 449 women consented to participate in the original intervention and were randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. Mothers and infants were assessed during pregnancy, and then at 2, 6, 12 and 18 months of infant age. At the 6 month follow‐up visit, 79% (354 out of 449) of the participants were retained. Post hoc analyses were conducted on the original sample to determine breastfeeding status. Sixty‐nine percent of the women completed the feeding observation at the 6 months follow‐up visit, of which 47% reported exclusively breastfeeding and 22% reported bottle‐feeding. Results: Results demonstrated that during a feeding interaction, maternal sensitivity was significantly improved among non‐breastfeeding mothers who received the intervention. Particularly, maternal responsiveness to infant cues and synchronous interactions was higher among non‐breastfeeding intervention mothers compared to control group mothers. The results also show that non‐breastfeeding mothers who received the intervention were significantly less intrusive in their interactions with their infants. Conclusion: The intervention had particular beneficial effects for mothers who were not breastfeeding and suggest that the intervention offered a protective effect for non‐breastfeeding mothers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21881

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomlinson, M., Rabie, S., Skeen, S., Hunt, X., Murray, L., & Cooper, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Tomlinson, Mark
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
850-858
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W3043469285
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (B574100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
mother-infant interaction, infant feeding, maternal sensitivity, breastfeeding, synchronous interaction, maternal intrusiveness, low-income communities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bottle Feeding, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Poverty, Pregnancy, South Africa, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review