Cited by 27Infant Development and Preterm CareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Preterm infant mental health in the neonatal intensive care unit: A review of research on NICU parent-infant interactions and maternal sensitivity

Open access
Hartzell, Georgina, Shaw, Richard J., Givrad, Soudabeh·2023·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Caregiving relationships in the postnatal period are critical to an infant's development. Preterm infants and their parents face unique challenges in this regard, with infants experiencing separation from parents, uncomfortable procedures, and increased biologic vulnerability, and parents facing difficulties assuming caregiver roles and increased risk for psychological distress. To better understand the NICU parent‐infant relationship, we conducted a review of the literature and identified 52 studies comparing observed maternal, infant, and dyadic interaction behavior in preterm dyads with full‐term dyads. Eighteen of 40 studies on maternal behavior found less favorable behavior, including decreased sensitivity and more intrusiveness in mothers of preterm infants, seven studies found the opposite, four studies found mixed results, and 11 studies found no differences. Seventeen of 25 studies on infant behavior found less responsiveness in preterm infants, two studies found the opposite, and the remainder found no difference. Eighteen out of 14 studies on dyad‐specific behavior reported less synchrony in preterm dyads and the remainder found no differences. We identify confounding factors that may explain variations in results, present an approach to interpret existing data by framing differences in maternal behavior as potentially adaptive in the context of prematurity, and suggest future areas for exploration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.22086

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maladaptive parenting behaviors such as insensitivity and intrusiveness have been observed in mothers of preterm infants.

    “Maladaptive parenting behaviors such as insensitivity and intrusiveness have also been observed in mothers of preterm infants (Hartzell et al., 2023).”

    From “NICU Doesn’t Stop in the NICU”: Maternal Perspectives of the Impact of a NICU Experience over Time (2026) · cites this paper as Hartzell et al., 2023

    The Maternal Behavior section reports that some studies observed lower sensitivity and more intrusive behavior in mothers of preterm infants. However, the Introduction and Discussion caution that these differences may be compensatory adaptations rather than maladaptive parenting, so the claim's categorical label overstates the review. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ban, L., Gibson, J. E., West, J., Fiaschi, L., Oates, M. R., & Tata, L. J. (2012). Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on maternal perina- tal mental illnesses presenting to UK general practice. The British Journal of General Practice, 62(603), e671-e678. https://doi.org/10. 3399/bjgp12İ656801 · DOI
  2. Montirosso, R., Borgatti, R., Trojan, S., Zanini, R., & Tronick, E. (2010). A comparison of dyadic interactions and coping with still- face in healthy pre-term and full-term infants. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(Pt 2), 347-368. https://doi.org/10. 1348/026151009İ416429 · DOI

Authors
Hartzell, G., Shaw, R. J., & Givrad, S.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Hartzell, Georgina
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-10
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
837-856
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W4387472614
Cited by
27
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
preterm infants, parent-infant interaction, maternal sensitivity, neonatal intensive care unit, maternal intrusiveness, infant responsiveness, dyadic synchrony, maternal distress, preterm birth, full-term comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Mental Health, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review