Cited by 2,166Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesAlgorithms and Data CompressionScientific Computing and Data Management

Ultrafast one‐pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp

Open access
Chen, Shifu·2023·iMeta

Abstract

A large amount of sequencing data is generated and processed every day with the continuous evolution of sequencing technology and the expansion of sequencing applications. One consequence of such sequencing data explosion is the increasing cost and complexity of data processing. The preprocessing of FASTQ data, which means removing adapter contamination, filtering low‐quality reads, and correcting wrongly represented bases, is an indispensable but resource intensive part of sequencing data analysis. Therefore, although a lot of software applications have been developed to solve this problem, bioinformatics scientists and engineers are still pursuing faster, simpler, and more energy‐efficient software. Several years ago, the author developed fastp, which is an ultrafast all‐in‐one FASTQ data preprocessor with many modern features. This software has been approved by many bioinformatics users and has been continuously maintained and updated. Since the first publication on fastp, it has been greatly improved, making it even faster and more powerful. For instance, the duplication evaluation module has been improved, and a new deduplication module has been added. This study aimed to introduce the new features of fastp and demonstrate how it was designed and implemented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imt2.107

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Gargis, Amy S., Lisa Kalman, Meredith W. Berry, David P. Bick, David P. Dimmock, Tina Hambuch, Fei Lu, et al. 2012. “ Assuring the Quality of Next‐Generation Sequencing in Clinical Laboratory Practice.” Nature Biotechnology 30: 1033– 6. 10.1038/nbt.2403 PMC3827024 23138292 · DOI
  2. [2]Deng, Shibing, Maruja Lira, Donghui Huang, Kai Wang, Crystal Valdez, Jennifer Kinong, and Paul A. Rejto, et al. 2018. “ TNER: A Novel Background Error Suppression Method for Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumor DNA.” BMC Bioinformatics 19: 387. 10.1186/s12859-018-2428-3 30342468 PMC6195972 · DOI
  3. [5]Brown, Joseph, Meg Pirrung, and Lee Ann McCue. 2017. “ FQC Dashboard: Integrates FastQC Results Into a Web‐based, Interactive, and Extensible FASTQ Quality Control Tool.” Bioinformatics 33: 3137– 9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373 28605449 PMC5870778 · DOI
  4. [6]Patel, Ravi K., and Mukesh Jain. 2012. “ NGS QC Toolkit: A Toolkit for Quality Control of Next Generation Sequencing Data.” PLoS ONE 7: e30619. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030619 22312429 PMC3270013 · DOI
  5. [7]Chen, Shifu, Yanqing Zhou, Yaru Chen, and Jia Gu. 2018. “ fastp: An Ultra‐Fast All‐In‐One FASTQ Preprocessor.” Bioinformatics 34: i884– 90. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 30423086 PMC6129281 · DOI
  6. [8]Grüning, Björn, Ryan Dale, Andreas Sjödin, Brad A. Chapman, Jillian Rowe, Christopher H. Tomkins‐Tinch, Renan Valieris, and Johannes Köster. 2018. “ Bioconda: Sustainable and Comprehensive Software Distribution for the Life Sciences.” Nature Methods 15: 475– 6. 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7 29967506 PMC11070151 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Shifu
Venue
iMeta
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
e107-e107
ISSN
  • 2770-596X (ISSN-L)
  • 2770-5986
OpenAlex
W4375863320
Cited by
2,166
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 888 · 2025: 953 · 2024: 288 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
192.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iMeta (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (JSGG20180508152646606, JSGG20180703164202084, KQJSCX20180330124428928)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
fastp, adapter removal, read quality filtering, read deduplication, sequencing data quality control, bioinformatics software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review