The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ImageGP: An easy‐to‐use data visualization web server for scientific researchers
Open accessAbstract
Data visualization plays a crucial role in illustrating results and sharing knowledge among researchers. Though many types of visualization tools are widely used, most of them require enough coding experience or are designed for specialized usages, or are not free. Here, we present ImageGP, a specialized visualization platform designed for biology and chemistry data illustration. ImageGP could generate generalized plots like lines, bars, scatters, boxes, sets, heatmaps, and histograms with the most common input content in a user‐friendly interface. Normally plotting using ImageGP only needs a few mouse clicks. For some plots, one only needs to just paste data and click submit to get the visualization results. Additionally, ImageGP supplies up to 26 parameters to meet customizable requirements. ImageGP also contains specialized plots like volcano plot, functional enrichment plot for most omics‐data analysis, and other four specialized functions for microbiome analysis. Since 2017, ImageGP has been running for nearly 5 years and serving 336,951 visits from all over the world. Together, ImageGP (http://www.ehbio.com/ImageGP/) is an effective and efficient tool for experimental researchers to comprehensively visualize and interpret data generated from wet‐lab and dry‐lab.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wickham, H. (2016) · Use R! · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 · Cited by 33,115
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties
Conway, J. R., Lex, A., & Gehlenborg, N. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364 · Cited by 3,586
Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome
Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W., & Doebeli, M. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf4507 · Cited by 3,510
VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R
Chen, H., & Boutros, P. C. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-35 · Cited by 3,131
A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data
Liu, Y.-X., Qin, Y., Chen, T., Lu, M., Qian, X., Guo, X., & Bai, Y. (2021) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-020-00724-8 · Cited by 864
Self-citationggfortify: Unified Interface to Visualize Statistical Results of Popular R Packages
Tang, Y., Horikoshi, M., & Li, W. (2016) · The R Journal · doi:10.32614/rj-2016-060 · Cited by 862
m6A RNA Methylation Is Regulated by MicroRNAs and Promotes Reprogramming to Pluripotency
Chen, T., Hao, Y.-J., Zhang, Y., Li, M.-M., Wang, M., Han, W., Wu, Y., Lv, Y., Hao, J., Wang, L., et al. (2015) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.016 · Cited by 551
Self-citationBugBase predicts organism-level microbiome phenotypes
Ward, T., Larson, J., Meulemans, J., Hillmann, B., Lynch, J., Sidiropoulos, D., Spear, J. R., Caporaso, G., Blekhman, R., Knight, R., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/133462 · Cited by 479
Visualization of Biomedical Data
O’Donoghue, S. I., Baldi, B. F., Clark, S. J., Darling, A. E., Hogan, J. M., Kaur, S., Maier‐Hein, L., McCarthy, D. J., Moore, W. J., Stenau, E., et al. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013424 · Cited by 94
Parallel‐Meta Suite: Interactive and rapid microbiome data analysis on multiple platforms
Chen, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Sun, Z., Jing, G., Huang, S. W., & Su, X. (2022) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.1 · Cited by 56
Grand Challenges in Bioinformatics Data Visualization
O’Donoghue, S. I. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2021.669186 · Cited by 53
Wong, B. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2258 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Majorbio Cloud: A one‐stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses
Ren, Y., Yu, G., Shi, C., Liu, L., Guo, Q., Han, C., Zhang, D., Zhang, L., Liu, B., Gao, H., et al. (2022) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.12 · Cited by 906
Self-citationWekemo Bioincloud: A user‐friendly platform for meta‐omics data analyses
Gao, Y., Zhang, G., Jiang, S., & Liu, Y. (2024) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.175 · Cited by 293
Self-citationSkowron, M. A., Eul, K., Stephan, A., Ludwig, G. F., Wakileh, G. A., Bister, A., Söhngen, C., Raba, K., Petzsch, P., Poschmann, G., et al. (2022) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13282 · Cited by 20
Söhngen, C., Thomas, D. J., Skowron, M. A., Bremmer, F., Eckstein, M., Stefanski, A., Driessen, M. D., Wakileh, G. A., Stühler, K., Altevogt, P., et al. (2023) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.16880 · Cited by 19
Martins-Macedo, J., Araújo, B., Anjo, S. I., Silveira-Rosa, T., Patrício, P., Alves, N. D., Silva, J. M., Teixeira, F. G., Manadas, B., Rodrigues, A. J., et al. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02490-z · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, T., Liu, Y., & Huang, L.
- Venue
- iMeta
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-21
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e5-e5
- ISSN
- 2770-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212823867
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 35.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
