The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
Abstract
We extend the main idea of a fuzzy analysis of consensus—that is based on a concept of a distance from consensus—to a case when individual testimonies are individual intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, as opposed to fuzzy preference relations commonly used. Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, that in addition to a membership degree (from [0, 1]) include a hesitation margin (concerning the membership degree), can better reflect the very imprecision of testimonies (expressing preferences) of the individuals during the consensus-reaching process. Our new solution, obtained as an interval-valued measure of a distance from consensus, better reflects both real human perception and a soft nature of consensus. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support
Fodor, J., & Roubens, M. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1648-2 · Cited by 2,019
Atanassov, K. T. (1999) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3 · Cited by 2,017
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications
Atanassov, K. T. (1999) · Cited by 1,372
Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems.
Dryden, M. M., Wang, P. P., & Chang, S. K. (1981) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232543 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Yu, S. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Intelligent Systems
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2003-06-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 837-852
- ISSN
- 0884-8173 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-111X
- OpenAlex
- W2002226861
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/int.10119
- The paper
- Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (2003). A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.10119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
