The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Abstract
The generalized ordered weighted averaging (GOWA) operators are a new class of operators, which were introduced by Yager (Fuzzy Optim Decision Making 2004;3:93–107). However, it seems that there is no investigation on these aggregation operators to deal with intuitionistic fuzzy or interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In this paper, we first develop some new generalized aggregation operators, such as generalized intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator, generalized intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging operator, generalized intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid averaging operator, generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator, generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging operator, generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid average operator, which extend the GOWA operators to accommodate the environment in which the given arguments are both intuitionistic fuzzy sets that are characterized by a membership function and a nonmembership function, and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, whose fundamental characteristic is that the values of its membership function and nonmembership function are intervals rather than exact numbers, and study their properties. Then, we apply them to multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy or interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
Cited by
Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets
Xu, Z., & Xia, M. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationFundamental Properties of Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators
Peng, X., & Yang, Y. (2016) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.21790 · Cited by 537
Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.05.012 · Cited by 451
Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems
Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T., Ghani, F., & Mahmood, T. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-172009 · Cited by 407
Liu, P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2248736 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Xu, Z., Ni, M., & Liu, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Intelligent Systems
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 0884-8173 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-111X
- OpenAlex
- W4230733346
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/int.20386
- The paper
- Zhao, H., Xu, Z., Ni, M., & Liu, S. (2010). Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
