Cited by 29Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

Perspectives and problems in student outcomes research

Pace, C. Robert·1985·New Directions for Institutional Research

Abstract

Over the years, many tests and techniques have been developed to measure the impact of college on students. Which to use depends on the institution's educational goals and on the content of each student's educational experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ir.37019854703

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pace, C. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Pace, C. Robert
Venue
New Directions for Institutional Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-09
Volume
1985
Issue
47
Pages
7-18
ISSN
  • 0271-0579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-075X
OpenAlex
W2103786886
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
19.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Directions for Institutional Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
student learning assessment, educational goals, institutional research, educational outcomes measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review