Cited by 191Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchSmoking Behavior and CessationOral Health Pathology and Treatment

Impact of Tobacco Use on Periodontal Status

Johnson, Georgia K., Slach, Nancy A.·2001·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

This article reviews the effects of smoked and smokeless tobacco on periodontal status, including the impact of smoking on periodontal therapy and potential mechanisms for the adverse effects of tobacco on the periodontium. Approximately half of periodontitis cases have been attributed to either current or former smoking. Both cigar and cigarette smokers have significantly greater loss of bone height than nonsmokers, and there is a trend for pipe smokers to have more bone loss than nonsmokers. Unlike smokers, who experience widespread periodontal destruction, the most prevalent effects of smokeless tobacco are localized to the site of placement, in the form of gingival recession and white mucosal lesions. Smoking has an adverse effect on all forms of periodontal therapy, and up to 90 percent of refractory periodontitis patients are smokers. The pathogenesis of smoking‐related periodontal destruction has been attributed to alterations in the microflora and/or host response. Some data indicates that smoking may increase levels of certain periodontal pathogens, but there is more evidence that smoking has a negative effect on host response, such as neutrophil function and antibody production. An encouraging finding is that periodontal disease progression slows in patients who quit smoking and that these individuals have a similar response to periodontal therapy as nonsmokers. The facts presented in this paper will assist dental health professionals in treatment‐planning decisions and provide them with important information to share with patients who use tobacco products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.4.tb03401.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, G. K., & Slach, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Georgia K.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
313-321
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W2097473859
Cited by
191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
tobacco use, smoking, smokeless tobacco, periodontitis, periodontal health, alveolar bone loss, periodontal treatment, refractory periodontitis, gingival recession, periodontal pathogens, host response, neutrophil function, antibody production, smoking cessation, treatment planning
MeSH terms
Disease Susceptibility, Gingival Recession, Humans, Leukoplakia, Oral, Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Periodontium, Plants, Toxic, Smoking, Tobacco, Smokeless, United States, Wound Healing, Tobacco Use Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review