Caries Risk Assessment in an Educational Environment
Abstract
This study was designed to assess, retrospectively using dental records, the impact on the management of dental caries of new caries risk assessment (CRA) forms and procedures introduced into a predoctoral dental school clinic. Of 3,659 patients with a new patient visit (NPV) and baseline exam (BE) in the two‐year period of July 2003 through June 2005, 69 percent (n= 2,516) had a baseline CRA. “Visible cavitation or caries into dentin by radiograph” was significantly correlated to most items included in the CRA form, for example, “frequent between meal snack of sugars/cooked starch” (p<0.001), “inadequate saliva flow” (p=0.03), and “deep pits and fissures or developmental defects” (p<0.001). Fluoride toothpaste use (odds ratio, OR=0.7) was negatively related to cavitation risk while “readily visible heavy plaque on teeth” (OR=2.0), “frequent between meal snack of sugars/cooked starch” (OR=1.6), “interproximal enamel lesions or radiolucencies” (OR=11.8), and “white spots or occlusal discoloration” (OR=1.50) were positively related. CRA use at follow‐up, the use of bacterial tests, antibacterial therapy, and specific patient recommendations were all very low. While the content and usefulness of the CRA procedures were validated, the study highlighted the difficulties of implementing such programs in educational establishments even with an extensive student didactic program and faculty training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incorporation of caries risk assessment into dental curricula and public health environments reduces the incidence of early childhood caries, particularly in communities with limited access to routine dental care.
“Furthermore, the incorporation of CRA into dental curricula in educational institutions and public health environments has proven effective in reducing the incidence of early childhood caries, particularly in communities with limited access to routine dental care [16].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Interventions grounded in caries risk assessment can decrease caries incidence by 40-60% in children over five years classified as high-risk.
“Studies demonstrate that interventions grounded in caries risk assessment can decrease caries incidence by 40-60% in children over five years classified as high-risk [16].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Evidence for Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA®)
Featherstone, J. D. B., & Chaffee, B. W. (2018) · Advances in Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034517736500 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citationRiley, J. L., Gordan, V. V., Ajmo, C. T., Bockman, H., Jackson, M. B., Gilbert, G. H., & for The Dental PBRN Collaborative Group (2011) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00626.x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
AL-Kaff, A. A., Alshehri, A. Z., Alasmari, R. A., Alsubaie, N., Aldaws, A., Althaqeel, A., Alshehri, R. S., & Alawaji, Y. M. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.87450 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Evidence-based strategies, such as reducing sugar intake, promoting fluoride toothpaste, and implementing oral health programs in schools, have demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering caries prevalence [16,17].”
- Authors
- Doméjean‐Orliaguet, S., Gansky, S. A., & Featherstone, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Featherstone, John D.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1346-1354
- ISSN
- 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7837
- OpenAlex
- W1940844650
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
- National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54 DE14251)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Keywords
- caries risk assessment, dental school clinic, predoctoral dental students, caries risk factors, dental plaque, fluoride toothpaste, salivary flow, pit and fissure caries, caries management
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cariostatic Agents, Child, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Activity Tests, Dental Clinics, Dental Fissures, Diet, Cariogenic, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Insurance, Dental, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, San Francisco, Schools, Dental, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review