Cited by 19Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station

Barbour, Michele E., Sandy, Jonathan R.·2014·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) are an increasingly popular tool for selecting entrants to undergraduate degree programs in dentistry in the United Kingdom. This article reports on the use of MMI to select dental students at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom, over two successive admissions cycles (2011–12 and 2012–13). MMI provided an efficient means to discriminate between the performance of applicants who were all academically highly qualified, with total scores ranging from 35 percent to 87 percent of the maximum possible score. Female candidates performed significantly better than male candidates when assessed by total score (p=0.011; mean score 94.4 for female applicants and 91.9 for male applicants) and by outcome (offer/decline; p=0.016; 58.6 percent of female and 46.4 percent of male interviewees received an offer of study following interview). There was no statistically significant effect of starting station on candidate performance (p=0.359), indicating that a candidate's overall chance of success in the MMI was not influenced by which station he or she experienced first. Stakeholder acceptance was good, with 75 percent of candidates and 95 percent of assessors preferring MMI over traditional interviews.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05710.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2004.68.6.tb03778.x · DOI
  2. Cleland J., 2013, Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students
  3. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.56 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/medu.12193 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/jama.2012.36914 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hofmeister M., 2008, The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection, Fam Med, 40, 734
  7. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820f9677 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03260.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02972.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sebok S.S., Psychometric properties of the multiple mini‐interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
  12. 10.1590/S0103-64402010000100013 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00706.x · DOI
  14. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.11.tb04823.x · DOI
  15. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.9.tb05368.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Barbour, M. E., & Sandy, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Barbour, Michele E.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
589-596
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W2158527746
Cited by
19
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
multiple mini-interviews, dental school admissions, applicant selection, gender differences, interview performance, stakeholder acceptance, University of Bristol
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Career Choice, Communication, Community Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Educational Measurement, England, Ethics, Dental, Faculty, Dental, Feedback, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Motor Skills, Personnel Selection, Professional Competence, School Admission Criteria, Sex Factors, Students, Dental, Cohort Studies, Dental Research, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05710.x
The paper
Barbour, M. E., & Sandy, J. R. (2014). Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05710.x