The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station
Abstract
Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) are an increasingly popular tool for selecting entrants to undergraduate degree programs in dentistry in the United Kingdom. This article reports on the use of MMI to select dental students at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom, over two successive admissions cycles (2011–12 and 2012–13). MMI provided an efficient means to discriminate between the performance of applicants who were all academically highly qualified, with total scores ranging from 35 percent to 87 percent of the maximum possible score. Female candidates performed significantly better than male candidates when assessed by total score (p=0.011; mean score 94.4 for female applicants and 91.9 for male applicants) and by outcome (offer/decline; p=0.016; 58.6 percent of female and 46.4 percent of male interviewees received an offer of study following interview). There was no statistically significant effect of starting station on candidate performance (p=0.359), indicating that a candidate's overall chance of success in the MMI was not influenced by which station he or she experienced first. Stakeholder acceptance was good, with 75 percent of candidates and 95 percent of assessors preferring MMI over traditional interviews.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Stakeholder acceptance was good, with 75% of candidates and 95% of assessors preferring MMI over traditional interviews”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Barbour M. E. et al., (49) 2014
In the citing paper
“MMI provided an efficient means to discriminate between the performance of applicants who were all academically highly qualified, with total scores ranging from 35% to 87% of the maximum possible score”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Barbour M. E. et al., (49) 2014
In the citing paper
“Female candidates performed significantly better than male candidates when assessed by total score (p = 0.011; mean score 94.4 for female applicants and 91.9 for male applicants) and by outcome (offer/decline; p = 0.016; 58.6% of female and 46.4% of male interviewees received an offer of study following interview)”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Barbour M. E. et al., (49) 2014
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2004.68.6.tb03778.x · DOI
- Cleland J., 2013, Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students
- 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.56 · DOI
- 10.1111/medu.12193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2012.36914 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofmeister M., 2008, The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection, Fam Med, 40, 734
- 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820f9677 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03260.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02972.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267 · DOI · Paper page
- Sebok S.S., Psychometric properties of the multiple mini‐interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
- 10.1590/S0103-64402010000100013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00706.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.11.tb04823.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.9.tb05368.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbour, M. E., & Sandy, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Barbour, Michele E.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 589-596
- ISSN
- 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7837
- OpenAlex
- W2158527746
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- multiple mini-interviews, dental school admissions, applicant selection, gender differences, interview performance, stakeholder acceptance, University of Bristol
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Career Choice, Communication, Community Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Educational Measurement, England, Ethics, Dental, Faculty, Dental, Feedback, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Motor Skills, Personnel Selection, Professional Competence, School Admission Criteria, Sex Factors, Students, Dental, Cohort Studies, Dental Research, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05710.x
- The paper
- Barbour, M. E., & Sandy, J. R. (2014). Multiple Mini Interviews for Selection of Dental Students: Influence of Gender and Starting Station. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05710.x