rho family GTPase activating proteins p190, bcr and rhoGAP show distinct specificities in vitro and in vivo
Open accessAbstract
rho family GTPases link extracellular signals to changes in the organization of cytoskeletal actin. Serum stimulation of quiescent Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts leads to rho-dependent actin stress fibre formation and focal adhesions, whilst several growth factors initiate signalling pathways leading to rac-dependent actin polymerization at the plasma membrane, and membrane ruffling. The product of the breakpoint cluster region gene bcr, rho GTPase accelerating protein (rhoGAP) and rasGAP-associated p190 share structurally related rho GAP domains, and possess GAP activity for rho family members in vitro. We have directly compared the activities of the isolated GAP domains of these three proteins in regulating different rho family GTPases, both by in vitro assays and by microinjection, to address their possible physiologic functions. We show that bcr accelerates the GTPase activity of rac, but not rho in vitro, and inhibits rac-mediated membrane ruffling, but not rho-mediated stress fibre formation, after microinjection into Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. In vitro, rhoGAP has a striking preference for G25K as a substrate, whilst p190GAP has marked preferential activity for rho. Furthermore, p190 preferentially inhibits rho-mediated stress fibre formation in vivo. Our data suggest that p190, rhoGAP and bcr play distinct roles in signalling pathways mediated through different rho family GTPases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
p190-RhoGAP inactivates RhoA and not Cdc42 and Rac1, but does not differentiate among RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC.
“For example, p190-RhoGAP inactivates RhoA and not Cdc42 and Rac1 [27], but it does not differentiate among RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC [28].”
From RhoA Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
The in vitro results report that p190GAP is ninefold more effective against rho than against rac or G25K, supporting a preference for rho but not the claim that it does not act on Rac1. The same section says p190GAP has some capacity to down-regulate all three tested proteins. The RhoA/RhoB/RhoC comparison is attached to a different citation [28], so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Trahey, M., & McCormick, F. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2821624 · Cited by 1,211 · see citing works
The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP
Xu, G., O'Connell, P., Viskochil, D., Cawthon, R., Robertson, M., Culver, M., Dunn, D., Stevens, J., Gesteland, R., White, R., et al. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90024-9 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Shinjo,K., Koland,J.G., Hart,M.J., Narasimhan,V., Johnson,D.I., Evans,T. and Cerione,R.A. (1990) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 9853–9587.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mîinea, C. P., Sano, H., Kane, S., Sano, E., Fukuda, M., Peränen, J., Lane, W. S., & Lienhard, G. E. (2005) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20050887 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
RhoA Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Schmidt, S. I., Blaabjerg, M., Freude, K., & Meyer, M. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11091520 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Characterization of the Effector-specifying Domain of Rac Involved in NADPH Oxidase Activation
Kwong, C. H., Adams, A. G., & Leto, T. L. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.34.19868 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ridley, A. J., Self, A. J., Kasmi, F., Paterson, H. F., Hall, A., Marshall, C. J., & Ellis, C.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5151-5160
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC413777
- OpenAlex
- W108705584
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Keywords
- Rho GTPases, GTPase-activating protein, p190, BCR, RhoGAP, Rac, substrate specificity, stress fibers, ruffles, focal adhesions, actin polymerization, Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, microinjection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Actin Cytoskeleton, Microinjections, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Signal Transduction, 3T3 Cells, GTP-Binding Proteins, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, GTPase-Activating Proteins, rac GTP-Binding Proteins, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review