Cited by 51Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Within‐session sensitization and between‐session habituation: A robust physiological response to repetitive painful heat stimulation

May, A., Rodriguez‐Raecke, R., Schulte, A., Ihle, K., Breimhorst, M., Birklein, F., Jürgens, T.P.·2012·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Habituation and sensitization are important behavioural responses to repeated exposure of painful stimuli. Whereas within‐session response dynamics to nociceptive stimuli is well characterized, little is known about long‐term behaviour due to repetitive nociceptive stimulation. We used a standardized longitudinal heat pain paradigm in 66 healthy participants, 21 patients with chronic low back pain and 22 patients with depression who received daily sessions of 60 suprathreshold heat stimuli (48 °C each) for eight consecutive days. All three groups showed the same response: Repeated painful stimulation over several days resulted in substantially decreased pain ratings to identical painful stimuli. The decreased perception of pain over time was associated with a very robust increase in pain ratings in each single pain session, i.e., all participants sensitized within sessions and habituated between sessions. This uniform pattern was equally present in all examined groups. Chronic pain and depression do not seem to interfere with short‐term sensitization and long‐term habituation in this model of repetitive phasic heat pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00023.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Responses to a cue could change over the course of the experimental session due to factors such as fatigue, habituation or learning.

    “However, it is important to note that responses to a cue could change over the course of the experimental session due to factors such as fatigue, habituation or learning23–28.”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 51

Authors
May, A., Rodriguez‐Raecke, R., Schulte, A., Ihle, K., Breimhorst, M., Birklein, F., & Jürgens, T. P.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
May, A.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-19
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
401-409
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1532793389
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
thermal pain, pain perception, chronic low back pain, depression, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Low Back Pain, Pain Threshold, Pain Perception, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review